Google Pixel 11 Pro VS Vivo X300 Pro
We are comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro (Google) with the Vivo X300 Pro (Vivo). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Google Pixel 11 Pro AND Vivo X300 Pro
Here’s how Google Pixel 11 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 11 Pro
-
Higher resolution (1280 x 2856)
-
Phone unlock via face
-
10% lighter at 204g
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Pro
-
34% larger battery (6510 mAh vs 4850 mAh)
-
90% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3658712 vs 1925523)
-
33% higher single-core Geekbench score (3563 vs 2688)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 50 MP
-
53% higher multi-core Geekbench score (10512 vs 6871)
-
200% faster charging (90 W vs 30 W)
-
8% larger display (6.78 inches vs 6.3 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro AND Vivo X300 Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Google Pixel 11 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Vivo | |
| Release Date: | August 20, 2026 | October 17, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Tensor G6 | Dimensity 9500 |
| GPU: | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 204 g | 226g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.3 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1280 x 2856 | 1260×2800 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 497 | 453 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO OLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | — | 4500 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens, HDR |
| Main Camera Video: | 8K at 24/30 fps, 4K at 24/30/60 fps, 1080p at 24/30/60/120/240 fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 42 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | 50 MP |
| Focal Length | 25 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.28" |
| Pixel Size | 1.2 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Multi-directional PDAF | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.7 |
| Focal Length | 106 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.4" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | — | 15 mm |
| Sensor | — | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.51" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | — | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 42 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | 17 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX858 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.51" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 0.7 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 4850 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 31 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Ion | Si-C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 30W | 90W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB, 12 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 171 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2688 | 3563 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 6871 | 10512 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1925523 | 3658712 |
| CPU | 873099 | 1062762 |
| GPU | 286837 | 1342762 |
| MEM | 301575 | 466511 |
| UX | 464012 | 786677 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1856183 | 3539789 |
| CPU | 840990 | 1039348 |
| GPU | 277185 | 1371288 |
| MEM | 292032 | 383559 |
| UX | 445976 | 745594 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Sim |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro AND Vivo X300 Pro
The charts below visualize how Google Pixel 11 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro AND Vivo X300 Pro
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Google Pixel 11 Pro’s 6.3 inches screen compared to the Vivo X300 Pro’s 6.78 inches display.
Google Pixel 11 Pro
6.3 inches″
Vivo X300 Pro
6.78 inches″
Release Timeline of Google Pixel 11 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro was released 10 months, 3 days earlier than Google Pixel 11 Pro.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Google Pixel 11 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Vivo X300 Pro edges out overall compared to the Google Pixel 11 Pro. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Battery. They are still fairly close in Camera and Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.