Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold VS Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
We are comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (Google) with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Here’s how Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
-
5% larger display (8 inches vs 7.6 inches)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
-
Superior display technology (Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X)
-
73% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3382020 vs 1951408)
-
41% higher single-core Geekbench score (3645 vs 2587)
-
Higher resolution (1848 x 2448 pixels)
-
104% higher multi-core Geekbench score (11102 vs 5446)
-
50% faster charging (45 W vs 30 W)
-
16% lighter at 201g
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Samsung | |
| Release Date: | August 20, 2026 | August 7, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Tensor G6 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 17 |
| Weight: | 239 g | 201 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 8.0 inches | 7.6 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 2076 x 2152 | 1848 x 2448 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 374 | 403 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 48 MP | 50 MP + 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 24/30/60 fps, 1080p at 24/30/60/120/240 fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 10 MP | 10 MP + 10 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | Dual Pixel Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10.8 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/3.1 | — |
| Focal Length | 112 mm | — |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | OIS | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10.5 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.4" | 1/2.51" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 3648 x 2736 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3K1 | Sony IMX374 |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.94" | 1/3.52" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 4806 mAh | 4800 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 26 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 30W | 45W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2587 | 3645 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 5446 | 11102 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1951408 | 3382020 |
| CPU | 890938 | 992447 |
| GPU | 289193 | 1292614 |
| MEM | 306874 | 372424 |
| UX | 464403 | 724535 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1856183 | 2197874 |
| CPU | 840990 | 1177510 |
| GPU | 277185 | 1402206 |
| MEM | 292032 | 501463 |
| UX | 445976 | 922928 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Dual eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
The charts below visualize how Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold’s 8.0 inches screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8’s 7.6 inches display.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
8.0 inches″
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
7.6 inches″
Release Timeline of Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 was released 13 days earlier than Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 edges out overall compared to the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Display and Battery. They are still fairly close in Camera.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.