Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold VS Oppo Find N6
We are comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (Google) with the Oppo Find N6 (Oppo). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Oppo Find N6
Here’s how Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Oppo Find N6 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps
-
Phone unlock via face
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find N6
-
Higher Main Camera Resolution of 200 MP
-
25% larger battery (6000 mAh vs 4806 mAh)
-
95% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3809818 vs 1951408)
-
30% higher single-core Geekbench score (3367 vs 2587)
-
Higher resolution (2248x2480)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 20 MP
-
57% higher multi-core Geekbench score (8573 vs 5446)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Oppo Find N6
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Oppo Find N6.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold | Oppo Find N6 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Oppo | |
| Release Date: | August 20, 2026 | March 20, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Tensor G6 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 239 g | 225 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 8.0 inches | 8.12 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 2076 x 2152 | 2248x2480 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 374 | 412 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | — | 2500 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 24/30/60 fps, 1080p at 24/30/60/120/240 fps | 4K at 30/60/120fps (Dolby Vision), 1080p at 30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie Camera: | 10 MP | 20 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8000 x 6000 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 0.5 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | OIS |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10.8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.1 | f/2.7 |
| Focal Length | 112 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | 1/2.75" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | OIS |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10.5 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | — | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.4" | 1/2.75" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | AF |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3K1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.94" | 1/3.42" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 4806 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 30W | 80W wired, 44W UFCS, 55W PPS, 18W PD/QC |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB | 16GB, 12GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1TB, 512GB, 256GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2587 | 3367 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 5446 | 8573 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1951408 | 3809818 |
| CPU | 890938 | 928077 |
| GPU | 289193 | 1178963 |
| MEM | 306874 | 499953 |
| UX | 464403 | 629586 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1856183 | 3262605 |
| CPU | 840990 | 823441 |
| GPU | 277185 | 1232154 |
| MEM | 292032 | 392318 |
| UX | 445976 | 814692 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side-mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Oppo Find N6
The charts below visualize how Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Oppo Find N6 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Oppo Find N6
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold’s 8.0 inches screen compared to the Oppo Find N6’s 8.12 inches display.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
8.0 inches″
Oppo Find N6
8.12 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Oppo Find N6
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Oppo Find N6 edges out overall compared to the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Display and Battery. They are still fairly close in Camera.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.