Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold VS Motorola Razr Fold
We are comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (Google) with the Motorola Razr Fold (Motorola). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Motorola Razr Fold
Here’s how Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Motorola Razr Fold stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps
-
2% lighter at 239g
Reasons to consider the Motorola Razr Fold
-
25% larger battery (6000 mAh vs 4806 mAh)
-
55% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3024369 vs 1951408)
-
Higher resolution (2232 x 2484 pixels)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 32 MP + 20 MP
-
62% higher multi-core Geekbench score (8819 vs 5446)
-
167% faster charging (80 W vs 30 W)
-
1% larger display (8.1 inches vs 8 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Motorola Razr Fold
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Motorola Razr Fold.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold | Motorola Razr Fold |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Motorola | |
| Release Date: | August 20, 2026 | April 18, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Tensor G6 | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| GPU: | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Adreno 830 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 239 g | 243 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 8.0 inches | 8.1 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 2076 x 2152 | 2232 x 2484 pixels |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 374 | 410 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO P-OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 48 MP | 50 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 24/30/60 fps, 1080p at 24/30/60/120/240 fps | 8K at 30 fps, 4K at 30/60/120 fps, 1080p at 30/60/120/240 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 10 MP | 32 MP + 20 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8000 x 6000 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | — | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.28" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10.8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.1 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 112 mm | 71 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | 1/1.95" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10.5 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal Length | — | 12 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.4" | 1/2.76" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | Phase Autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3K1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.94" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 4806 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 16 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Charging Speed: | 30W | 80W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 164 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2587 | 2617 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 5446 | 8819 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1951408 | 3024369 |
| CPU | 890938 | 1003820 |
| GPU | 289193 | 1164992 |
| MEM | 306874 | 379415 |
| UX | 464403 | 678500 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1856183 | 2342132 |
| CPU | 840990 | 624873 |
| GPU | 277185 | 1217691 |
| MEM | 292032 | 449196 |
| UX | 445976 | 431276 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Motorola Razr Fold
The charts below visualize how Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Motorola Razr Fold stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Motorola Razr Fold
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold’s 8.0 inches screen compared to the Motorola Razr Fold’s 8.1 inches display.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
8.0 inches″
Motorola Razr Fold
8.1 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Motorola Razr Fold
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Motorola Razr Fold edges out overall compared to the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.