Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold VS Honor Magic V6
We are comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (Google) with the Honor Magic V6 (Honor). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Honor Magic V6
Here’s how Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Honor Magic V6 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
-
Selfie video of 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps
-
Phone unlock via face
-
1% larger display (8 inches vs 7.95 inches)
Reasons to consider the Honor Magic V6
-
39% larger battery (6660 mAh vs 4806 mAh)
-
112% higher AnTuTu v11 score (4144922 vs 1951408)
-
48% higher single-core Geekbench score (3834 vs 2587)
-
Higher resolution (2172 x 2352)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 20 MP
-
128% higher multi-core Geekbench score (12396 vs 5446)
-
167% faster charging (80 W vs 30 W)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Honor Magic V6
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Honor Magic V6.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold | Honor Magic V6 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Honor | |
| Release Date: | August 20, 2026 | March 13, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Tensor G6 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| GPU: | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Weight: | 239 g | 224 g, 219 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 8.0 inches | 7.95 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 2076 x 2152 | 2172 x 2352 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 374 | 403 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable LTPO2 AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Main Camera: | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 24/30/60 fps, 1080p at 24/30/60/120/240 fps | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie Camera: | 10 MP | 20 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 30 fps, 1080p at 30 fps, gyro-EIS |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8000 x 6000 | — |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10.8 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.1 | f/2.5 |
| Focal Length | 112 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | 1/2.0" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10.5 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.4" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | — |
| Autofocus | PDAF | AF |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | — |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3K1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.94" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | — |
| Autofocus | PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 4806 mAh | 6660 mAh |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Si/C Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 30W | 80W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB | 16 GB, 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2587 | 3834 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 5446 | 12396 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1951408 | 4144922 |
| CPU | 890938 | 1252566 |
| GPU | 289193 | 1615564 |
| MEM | 306874 | 474204 |
| UX | 464403 | 802588 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1856183 | 4004107 |
| CPU | 840990 | 1177510 |
| GPU | 277185 | 1402206 |
| MEM | 292032 | 501463 |
| UX | 445976 | 922928 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Honor Magic V6
The charts below visualize how Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Honor Magic V6 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Honor Magic V6
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold’s 8.0 inches screen compared to the Honor Magic V6’s 7.95 inches display.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
8.0 inches″
Honor Magic V6
7.95 inches″
Release Timeline of Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Honor Magic V6
Honor Magic V6 was released 5 months, 7 days earlier than Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Honor Magic V6
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Honor Magic V6 is slightly better overall compared to the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Battery. They are still fairly close in Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.