Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold VS Apple iPhone Duo
We are comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (Google) with the Apple iPhone Duo (Apple). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Apple iPhone Duo
Here’s how Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Apple iPhone Duo stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
-
33% more RAM (16GB vs 12GB)
-
Phone unlock via face
-
6% lighter at 239g
-
5% larger display (8 inches vs 7.6 inches)
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone Duo
-
12% larger battery (5400 mAh vs 4806 mAh)
-
57% higher AnTuTu v11 score (3061434 vs 1951408)
-
64% higher single-core Geekbench score (4231 vs 2587)
-
Higher resolution (1878 x 2670)
-
Higher Selfie Camera Resolution of 12 MP
-
142% higher multi-core Geekbench score (13202 vs 5446)
-
100% more storage (2 TB vs 1 TB)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Apple iPhone Duo
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Apple iPhone Duo.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold | Apple iPhone Duo |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Apple | |
| Release Date: | August 20, 2026 | October 23, 2026 |
| Mobile SoC: | Tensor G6 | A20 Pro |
| GPU: | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Apple A20 Pro GPU |
| Operating System: | Android 17 | iOS 27 |
| Weight: | 239 g | 254 g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 8.0 inches | 7.6 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 2076 x 2152 | 1878 x 2670 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 374 | 430 |
| Display Technology: | Foldable LTPO OLED | Foldable OLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 120 | 120 |
| Display Brightness: | — | 1000 nits |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | Multi-zone Laser AF, LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance | True Tone flash, Photonic Engine, Deep Fusion, Smart HDR 5, Night mode, Smart Take, Duo Preview, macro photography |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 24/30/60 fps, 1080p at 24/30/60/120/240 fps | 4K at 24/25/30/60/100/120 fps, 1080p at 25/30/60/120/240 fps, 720p at 30 fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 10 MP | 12 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps | 4K at 24/25/30/60 fps, 1080p at 25/30/60/120 fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Image Resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 8064 x 6048 |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.28" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | OIS | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10.8 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/3.1 | — |
| Focal Length | 112 mm | — |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.2" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | — |
| Autofocus | Dual Pixel PDAF | — |
| Stabilization | OIS | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10.5 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | — | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3J1 | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.4" | 1/2.55" |
| Pixel Size | 1.22 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Autofocus | PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 10 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | — |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3K1 | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/3.94" | — |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | — |
| Autofocus | PDAF | PDAF |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 4806 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | — | 24 |
| Battery Type: | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Charging Speed: | 30W | 60W |
| Wireless Charging: |
|
|
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage: | 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB | 2 TB, 1 TB, 512 GB, 256 GB |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2587 | 4231 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 5446 | 13202 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1951408 | 3061434 |
| CPU | 890938 | 904154 |
| GPU | 289193 | 1139824 |
| MEM | 306874 | 259571 |
| UX | 464403 | 757885 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1856183 | — |
| CPU | 840990 | — |
| GPU | 277185 | — |
| MEM | 292032 | — |
| UX | 445976 | — |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual eSIM |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Side Mounted | Side Mounted |
| Face Recognition: |
|
|
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
| Audio Jack: | No | No |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Apple iPhone Duo
The charts below visualize how Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Apple iPhone Duo stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold AND Apple iPhone Duo
Here’s a proportional visualization of the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold’s 8.0 inches screen compared to the Apple iPhone Duo’s 7.6 inches display.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
8.0 inches″
Apple iPhone Duo
7.6 inches″
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Apple iPhone Duo
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Apple iPhone Duo edges out overall compared to the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Its strongest advantages are in Performance, Camera and Battery. They are still fairly close in Display.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.