CAMON 40 Premier 5G VS CAMON 40 Pro 5G
We are comparing the CAMON 40 Premier 5G ( Tecno ) head-to-head with the CAMON 40 Pro 5G ( Tecno ) . You'll get the key pros and cons of each phone, in-depth specs, and performance highlights.
Note: This comparison of CAMON 40 Premier 5G vs. CAMON 40 Pro 5G is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF CAMON 40 Premier 5G AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Here’s how CAMON 40 Premier 5G and CAMON 40 Pro 5G stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which phone excels where.
Reasons to consider the CAMON 40 Premier 5G
-
Superior display technology (LTPO AMOLED)
-
76% higher AnTuTu v11 score (1605546 vs 909910)
-
17% higher single-core Geekbench score (1207 vs 1028)
-
Higher resolution (1260×2800)
-
27% higher multi-core Geekbench score (4144 vs 3273)
-
56% faster charging (70 W vs 45 W)
Reasons to consider the CAMON 40 Pro 5G
-
27% larger battery (5200 mAh vs 4100 mAh)
-
7% lighter at 179g
-
2% larger display (6.78 inches vs 6.67 inches)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF CAMON 40 Premier 5G AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Below is the detailed specification table comparing CAMON 40 Premier 5G and CAMON 40 Pro 5G.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that Phone wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | CAMON 40 Premier 5G | CAMON 40 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Brand: | Tecno | Tecno |
| Release Date: | March 3, 2025 | March 3, 2025 |
| Mobile SoC: | Dimensity 8350 | Dimensity 7300 |
| GPU: | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| Operating System: | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Weight: | 193g | 179g |
|
Display
|
||
| Display Size: | 6.67 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Display Resolution: | 1260×2800 | 1080x2436 |
| Display Pixels Per Inch: | 460 | 393 |
| Display Technology: | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Display Refresh Rate: | 144 | 144 |
| Display Brightness: | 1600 nits | — |
|
Camera
|
||
| Main Camera Setup: | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Main Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main Camera Features: | OIS, AI Burst (FlashSnap), 3× zoom, AI Bokeh | OIS, HDR, Panorama, Dual-LED Flash |
| Main Camera Video: | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps | 4K at 30/60fps, 1080p at 30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera: | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Selfie Camera Video: | 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30fps | 4K at 30fps, 1080p at 30fps |
|
Standard Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Focal Length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-701 | Sony LYT-700C |
| Sensor Size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Pixel Size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
|
Telephoto Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | — |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Focal Length | 70 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | — |
|
Ultra-wide Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Focal Length | 14 mm | — |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.76" | 1/4.0" |
| Pixel Size | 0.64 micron | — |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Selfie Lens
|
||
| Megapixels | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Image Resolution | — | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.5 |
| Focal Length | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.8" | 1/2.8" |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
|
Battery & Charging
|
||
| Battery Capacity: | 4100 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Battery Life (in hours tested): | 11 | 12 |
| Battery Type: | Si-C Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Charging Speed: | 70W | 45W |
|
Performance
|
||
| RAM: | 12 GB | 12 GB, 8 GB |
| Storage: | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| DxOMark Score: | — | 138 |
|
GEEKBENCH V6
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1207 | 1028 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 4144 | 3273 |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1605546 | 909910 |
| CPU | 350819 | 343943 |
| GPU | 493827 | 130295 |
| MEM | 306981 | 175086 |
| UX | 453919 | 260586 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1386706 | 679446 |
| CPU | 290292 | 213556 |
| GPU | 523438 | 154945 |
| MEM | 316747 | 149808 |
| UX | 256229 | 161137 |
|
Connectivity
|
||
| Network Technology: | 5G | 5G |
| SIM Type: | Dual Sim | Dual Sim |
| Wi-Fi: |
|
|
| Bluetooth: |
|
|
| GPS: |
|
|
| NFC: |
|
|
| USB: | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
|
Extras & Build
|
||
| Fingerprint Sensor: |
|
|
| Fingerprint Sensor Type: | Under Display | Under Display |
| Water Resistance: |
|
|
| Speaker: | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF CAMON 40 Premier 5G AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
The charts below visualize how CAMON 40 Premier 5G and CAMON 40 Pro 5G stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
SCREEN SIZE COMPARISON OF CAMON 40 Premier 5G AND CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Here’s a proportional visualization of the CAMON 40 Premier 5G’s 6.67 inches screen compared to the CAMON 40 Pro 5G’s 6.78 inches display. Each rectangle is scaled so you can see at a glance which phone offers a larger viewing area.
CAMON 40 Premier 5G
6.67 inches″
CAMON 40 Pro 5G
6.78 inches″
Release Timeline of CAMON 40 Premier 5G and CAMON 40 Pro 5G
CAMON 40 Premier 5G and CAMON 40 Pro 5G were released on the same day.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which phone gives better value.
CAMON 40 Premier 5G
CAMON 40 Pro 5G
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the CAMON 40 Premier 5G has a narrow overall lead compared to the CAMON 40 Pro 5G. Its strongest advantages are in Performance and Display. They are still fairly close in Camera and Battery.
Try to Compare Again One of These Phones With Another Phone
Pick which phone to keep, then search for the other phone to compare.