Xring O1 VS Dimensity 9400
We are comparing the Xring O1 (Xiaomi) with the Dimensity 9400 (MediaTek). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: March 28, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Xring O1 AND Dimensity 9400
Here’s how Xring O1 and Dimensity 9400 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Xring O1
-
5% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (3119 vs 2974)
-
8% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (9673 vs 8989)
-
1.3× more CPU cores (10 vs 8)
-
8% higher CPU frequency (3900 MHz vs 3620 MHz)
-
8% faster download speed (7900 Mbps vs 7300 Mbps)
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 9400
-
1% higher AnTuTu V11 score (3007264 vs 2963052)
-
11% higher memory frequency (5333 MHz vs 4800 MHz)
-
11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Xring O1 AND Dimensity 9400
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Xring O1 and Dimensity 9400.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Xring O1 | Dimensity 9400 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Xring O1 | Dimensity 9400 |
| Brand: | Xiaomi | MediaTek |
| Class: | High-End | High-End |
| Release Date: | May 22, 2025 | October 9, 2024 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 10 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 2x 3.9 GHz Cortex-X925, 4x 3.4 GHz Cortex-A725, 2x 1.9 GHz Cortex-A725, 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x 3.62 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x 3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 |
| CPU Frequency: | 3900 MHz | 3620 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Valhall 5th gen | Valhall 5th gen |
| GPU Frequency: | 1392 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 16 | 12 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 5701.6 Gigaflops | 4952.1 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5T | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 4800 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 76.8 Gb/s | 85.3 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3119 | 2974 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9673 | 8989 |
| GPU (V6) | 21781 | 21136 |
| Asset Compression | 340 MB/sec | 348.3 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 268.2 pages/sec | 270 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 291.3 Mpixels/sec | 290.1 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 242.3 images/sec | 224.6 images/sec |
| HDR | 293.8 Mpixels/sec | 278.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 37.4 images/sec | 32.3 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 92 images/sec | 86.9 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 9.39 Mpixels/sec | 9.44 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2963052 | 3007264 |
| CPU | 937172 | 935860 |
| GPU | 996086 | 1028819 |
| MEM | 409648 | 402371 |
| UX | 620146 | 640214 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2804501 | 2567604 |
| CPU | 691157 | 588346 |
| GPU | 1169069 | 1144127 |
| MEM | 594794 | 400005 |
| UX | 349481 | 435126 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | — | 18117 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 7900 Mbps | Up to 7300 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.4 | 6.0 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Xring NPU | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | 44 TOPS | 50 TOPS |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Xring O1 AND Dimensity 9400
The charts below visualize how Xring O1 and Dimensity 9400 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Xring O1 and Dimensity 9400
Dimensity 9400 was released 7 months, 13 days earlier than Xring O1.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Xring O1 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Dimensity 9400. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU, Graphics and Connectivity. The Dimensity 9400 is the better fit if your top priority is Memory.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.