Tensor G6 VS Dimensity 9500s
We are comparing the Tensor G6 (Google) with the Dimensity 9500s (MediaTek). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: August 22, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Tensor G6 AND Dimensity 9500s
Here’s how Tensor G6 and Dimensity 9500s stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Tensor G6
-
10% higher CPU frequency (4110 MHz vs 3730 MHz)
-
64% faster download speed (12000 Mbps vs 7300 Mbps)
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 9500s
-
57% higher AnTuTu V11 score (3037573 vs 1933536)
-
14% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (8358 vs 7321)
-
2.0× more GPU pipelines (12 vs 6)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Tensor G6 AND Dimensity 9500s
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Tensor G6 and Dimensity 9500s.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Tensor G6 | Dimensity 9500s |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Tensor G6 | Dimensity 9500s |
| Brand: | MediaTek | |
| Class: | Flagship | Flagship |
| Release Date: | August 12, 2026 | January 15, 2026 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.3-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 7 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 4.11 GHz C1-Ultra, 4x 3.38 GHz C1-Pro, 2x 2.65 GHz C1-Pro | 1x 3.73 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x 3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 |
| CPU Frequency: | 4110 MHz | 3730 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| Graphics Architecture: | PowerVR C-Series | Valhall 5th gen |
| GPU Frequency: | 1286 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 6 | 12 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 1975.2 Gigaflops | 4952.1 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | — | 5333 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | — | 85.3 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2677 | 2680 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 7321 | 8358 |
| GPU (V6) | 6216 | 20990 |
| Asset Compression | 323.9 MB/sec | 374.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 226.9 pages/sec | 259.5 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 278.6 Mpixels/sec | 301.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 166.7 images/sec | 231.8 images/sec |
| HDR | 226.3 Mpixels/sec | 267.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 28.7 images/sec | 37.9 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 73.3 images/sec | 86.8 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 8.44 Mpixels/sec | 10 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1933536 | 3037573 |
| CPU | 876037 | 894758 |
| GPU | 288736 | 1062191 |
| MEM | 304202 | 431390 |
| UX | 464561 | 649234 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1856183 | 3298445 |
| CPU | 840990 | 952789 |
| GPU | 277185 | 1130421 |
| MEM | 292032 | 502375 |
| UX | 445976 | 712860 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | 3380 | — |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Modem: | MediaTek M90 | — |
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 12000 Mbps | Up to 7300 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 5.4 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Fifth-gen Tensor Processing Unit | MediaTek NPU |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Tensor G6 AND Dimensity 9500s
The charts below visualize how Tensor G6 and Dimensity 9500s stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Tensor G6 and Dimensity 9500s
Dimensity 9500s was released 6 months, 28 days earlier than Tensor G6.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Dimensity 9500s edges out overall compared to the Tensor G6. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, Graphics and Memory. The Tensor G6 is the better fit if your top priority is Connectivity.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.