Tensor G6 VS Dimensity 8550
We are comparing the Tensor G6 (Google) with the Dimensity 8550 (MediaTek). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: September 13, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Tensor G6 AND Dimensity 8550
Here’s how Tensor G6 and Dimensity 8550 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Tensor G6
-
52% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2677 vs 1761)
-
2% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (7321 vs 7148)
-
21% higher CPU frequency (4110 MHz vs 3400 MHz)
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 8550
-
26% higher AnTuTu V11 score (2429134 vs 1933536)
-
1.3× more GPU pipelines (8 vs 6)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Tensor G6 AND Dimensity 8550
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Tensor G6 and Dimensity 8550.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Tensor G6 | Dimensity 8550 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Tensor G6 | Dimensity 8550 |
| Brand: | MediaTek | |
| Class: | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Release Date: | August 12, 2026 | May 27, 2026 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.3-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 7 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 4.11 GHz C1-Ultra, 4x 3.38 GHz C1-Pro, 2x 2.65 GHz C1-Pro | 1x 3.4 GHz Cortex-A725, 3x 3.2 GHz Cortex-A725, 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A725 |
| CPU Frequency: | 4110 MHz | 3400 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Mali-G720 MP8 |
| Graphics Architecture: | PowerVR C-Series | 5th gen |
| GPU Frequency: | 1286 MHz | 1508 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 6 | 8 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 1975.2 Gigaflops | 3088.4 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | — | 4800 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | — | 76.8 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2677 | 1761 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 7321 | 7148 |
| GPU (V6) | 6216 | 15891 |
| Asset Compression | 323.9 MB/sec | — |
| HTML 5 Browser | 226.9 pages/sec | — |
| PDF Renderer | 278.6 Mpixels/sec | — |
| Image Detection | 166.7 images/sec | — |
| HDR | 226.3 Mpixels/sec | — |
| Background Blur | 28.7 images/sec | — |
| Photo Processing | 73.3 images/sec | — |
| Ray Tracing | 8.44 Mpixels/sec | — |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1933536 | 2429134 |
| CPU | 876037 | 612932 |
| GPU | 288736 | 952016 |
| MEM | 304202 | 394012 |
| UX | 464561 | 470174 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1856183 | — |
| CPU | 840990 | — |
| GPU | 277185 | — |
| MEM | 292032 | — |
| UX | 445976 | — |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | 3380 | — |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Modem: | MediaTek M90 | — |
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 12000 Mbps | — |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 5.4 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Fifth-gen Tensor Processing Unit | MediaTek NPU 880 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Tensor G6 AND Dimensity 8550
The charts below visualize how Tensor G6 and Dimensity 8550 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Tensor G6 and Dimensity 8550
Dimensity 8550 was released 2 months, 16 days earlier than Tensor G6.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Dimensity 8550 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Tensor G6. Its strongest advantages are in Graphics and Memory. The Tensor G6 is the better fit if your top priority is CPU.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.