Tensor G6 VS A19 Pro
We are comparing the Tensor G6 (Google) with the A19 Pro (Apple). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: August 22, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Tensor G6 AND A19 Pro
Here’s how Tensor G6 and A19 Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Tensor G6
-
1.2× more CPU cores (7 vs 6)
-
20% faster download speed (12000 Mbps vs 10000 Mbps)
Reasons to consider the A19 Pro
-
44% higher AnTuTu V11 score (2785402 vs 1933536)
-
45% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (3895 vs 2677)
-
33% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (9746 vs 7321)
-
4% higher CPU frequency (4260 MHz vs 4110 MHz)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Tensor G6 AND A19 Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Tensor G6 and A19 Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Tensor G6 | A19 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Tensor G6 | A19 Pro |
| Brand: | Apple | |
| Class: | Flagship | High-End |
| Release Date: | August 12, 2026 | September 9, 2025 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.3-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 7 | 6 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 4.11 GHz C1-Ultra, 4x 3.38 GHz C1-Pro, 2x 2.65 GHz C1-Pro | 2x 4.26 GHz, 4x 2.51 GHz |
| CPU Frequency: | 4110 MHz | 4260 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Apple A19 Pro GPU |
| Graphics Architecture: | PowerVR C-Series | Apple A19 Pro GPU |
| GPU Frequency: | 1286 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 6 | 6 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 1975.2 Gigaflops | 2488.3 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | — | 4800 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | — | 75.8 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2677 | 3895 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 7321 | 9746 |
| GPU (V6) | 6216 | — |
| Asset Compression | 323.9 MB/sec | 320.6 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 226.9 pages/sec | 229.2 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 278.6 Mpixels/sec | 221.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 166.7 images/sec | 335.4 images/sec |
| HDR | 226.3 Mpixels/sec | 327.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 28.7 images/sec | 38.9 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 73.3 images/sec | 110.7 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 8.44 Mpixels/sec | 10.2 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1933536 | 2785402 |
| CPU | 876037 | 844594 |
| GPU | 288736 | 950787 |
| MEM | 304202 | 301140 |
| UX | 464561 | 688881 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1856183 | 2600719 |
| CPU | 840990 | 929218 |
| GPU | 277185 | 976500 |
| MEM | 292032 | 285782 |
| UX | 445976 | 409219 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | 3380 | — |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Modem: | MediaTek M90 | — |
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 12000 Mbps | Up to 10000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 6.0 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Fifth-gen Tensor Processing Unit | Neural Engine |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Tensor G6 AND A19 Pro
The charts below visualize how Tensor G6 and A19 Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the A19 Pro has a narrow overall lead compared to the Tensor G6. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU and Graphics. The Tensor G6 is the better fit if your top priority is Memory and Connectivity.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.