Tensor G5 VS Exynos 2500
We are comparing the Tensor G5 ( Google ) head-to-head with the Exynos 2500 ( Samsung ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Note: This comparison of Tensor G5 vs. Exynos 2500 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: March 28, 2026
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Tensor G5 AND Exynos 2500
Here’s how Tensor G5 and Exynos 2500 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which chipset excels where.
Reasons to consider the Tensor G5
-
15% higher CPU frequency (3780 MHz vs 3300 MHz)
Reasons to consider the Exynos 2500
-
80% higher AnTuTu V11 score (2437711 vs 1351330)
-
3% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2352 vs 2276)
-
30% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (8103 vs 6213)
-
1.3× more CPU cores (10 vs 8)
-
20% faster download speed (12000 Mbps vs 10000 Mbps)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Tensor G5 AND Exynos 2500
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Tensor G5 and Exynos 2500.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Tensor G5 | Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Tensor G5 | Exynos 2500 |
| Brand: | Samsung | |
| Class: | High-End | High-End |
| Release Date: | August 20, 2025 | June 23, 2025 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 10 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 3.78 GHz Cortex-X4, 5x 3.05 GHz Cortex-A725, 2x 2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x 3.3 GHz Cortex-X925, 2x 2.74 GHz Cortex-A725, 5x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A725, 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Frequency: | 3780 MHz | 3300 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | PowerVR GPU | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| Graphics Architecture: | — | RDNA 3 |
| GPU Frequency: | 1100 MHz | 999 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 6 | 8 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 1536 Gigaflops | 4091.9 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 4266 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 68.2 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2276 | 2352 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 6213 | 8103 |
| GPU (V6) | 3696 | 25840 |
| Asset Compression | 284.2 MB/sec | 390.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 188.4 pages/sec | 179.4 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 219.7 Mpixels/sec | 218.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 147.9 images/sec | 247.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 181.5 Mpixels/sec | 309 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 24.2 images/sec | 36.4 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 61.1 images/sec | 89.9 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 7.51 Mpixels/sec | 12.7 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1351330 | 2437711 |
| CPU | 610905 | 822434 |
| GPU | 180044 | 817393 |
| MEM | 219947 | 339157 |
| UX | 340434 | 458727 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1030472 | 2047807 |
| CPU | 266714 | 486530 |
| GPU | 359552 | 828627 |
| MEM | 236256 | 441040 |
| UX | 167950 | 291610 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 10000 Mbps | Up to 12000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 5.4 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Tensor | Samsung NPU |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | — | 59 TOPS |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Tensor G5 AND Exynos 2500
The charts below visualize how Tensor G5 and Exynos 2500 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Tensor G5 and Exynos 2500
Exynos 2500 was released 1 month, 28 days earlier than Tensor G5.
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Exynos 2500 is slightly better overall compared to the Tensor G5. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.