Tensor G5 VS Exynos 1680
We are comparing the Tensor G5 (Google) with the Exynos 1680 (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: September 13, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Tensor G5 AND Exynos 1680
Here’s how Tensor G5 and Exynos 1680 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Tensor G5
-
64% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2276 vs 1389)
-
40% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (6213 vs 4453)
-
30% higher CPU frequency (3780 MHz vs 2900 MHz)
-
96% faster download speed (10000 Mbps vs 5100 Mbps)
-
3.0× more GPU pipelines (6 vs 2)
Reasons to consider the Exynos 1680
-
3% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1390055 vs 1351330)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Tensor G5 AND Exynos 1680
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Tensor G5 and Exynos 1680.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Tensor G5 | Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Tensor G5 | Exynos 1680 |
| Brand: | Samsung | |
| Class: | High-End | Mid-range |
| Release Date: | August 20, 2025 | March 25, 2026 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 3.78 GHz Cortex-X4, 5x 3.05 GHz Cortex-A725, 2x 2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720, 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Frequency: | 3780 MHz | 2900 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | PowerVR GPU | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| Graphics Architecture: | — | RDNA 3 |
| GPU Frequency: | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 6 | 2 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 1536 Gigaflops | 1228.8 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 4266 MHz | — |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 68.2 Gb/s | — |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2276 | 1389 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 6213 | 4453 |
| GPU (V6) | 3696 | 7924 |
| Asset Compression | 284.2 MB/sec | 212.5 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 188.4 pages/sec | 125.8 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 219.7 Mpixels/sec | 144.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 147.9 images/sec | 86.1 images/sec |
| HDR | 181.5 Mpixels/sec | 141.1 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 24.2 images/sec | 18 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 61.1 images/sec | 39.6 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 7.51 Mpixels/sec | 5.87 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1351330 | 1390055 |
| CPU | 610905 | 510705 |
| GPU | 180044 | 374535 |
| MEM | 219947 | 204469 |
| UX | 340434 | 300346 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1030472 | — |
| CPU | 266714 | — |
| GPU | 359552 | — |
| MEM | 236256 | — |
| UX | 167950 | — |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 10000 Mbps | Up to 5100 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 6.1 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Tensor | NPU |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | — | 19.6 TOPS |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Tensor G5 AND Exynos 1680
The charts below visualize how Tensor G5 and Exynos 1680 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Tensor G5 and Exynos 1680
Tensor G5 was released 7 months, 5 days earlier than Exynos 1680.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Tensor G5 is slightly better overall compared to the Exynos 1680. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU, Memory and Connectivity. They are still fairly close in Graphics.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.