Tensor G4 VS Tensor G5
We are comparing the Tensor G4 (Google) with the Tensor G5 (Google). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: March 28, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Tensor G4 AND Tensor G5
Here’s how Tensor G4 and Tensor G5 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Tensor G4
-
10% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1487240 vs 1351330)
-
1.2× more GPU pipelines (7 vs 6)
Reasons to consider the Tensor G5
-
15% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2276 vs 1984)
-
29% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (6213 vs 4825)
-
22% higher CPU frequency (3780 MHz vs 3100 MHz)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Tensor G4 AND Tensor G5
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Tensor G4 and Tensor G5.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Tensor G4 | Tensor G5 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Tensor G4 | Tensor G5 |
| Brand: | ||
| Class: | High-End | High-End |
| Release Date: | August 13, 2024 | August 20, 2025 |
| Foundry: | Samsung Foundry | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 3.1 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 4x 1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x 3.78 GHz Cortex-X4, 5x 3.05 GHz Cortex-A725, 2x 2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Frequency: | 3100 MHz | 3780 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Mali-G715 MP7 | PowerVR GPU |
| Graphics Architecture: | Valhall 4th gen | — |
| GPU Frequency: | 940 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 7 | 6 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 1684.4 Gigaflops | 1536 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 4266 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 68.2 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1984 | 2276 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 4825 | 6213 |
| GPU (V6) | 6549 | 3696 |
| Asset Compression | 191.8 MB/sec | 284.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 148.7 pages/sec | 188.4 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 158.3 Mpixels/sec | 219.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 123.4 images/sec | 147.9 images/sec |
| HDR | 134.5 Mpixels/sec | 181.5 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 15.6 images/sec | 24.2 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 46 images/sec | 61.1 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.8 Mpixels/sec | 7.51 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1487240 | 1351330 |
| CPU | 520180 | 610905 |
| GPU | 416466 | 180044 |
| MEM | 231906 | 219947 |
| UX | 318688 | 340434 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1291119 | 1030472 |
| CPU | 387719 | 266714 |
| GPU | 456122 | 359552 |
| MEM | 207898 | 236256 |
| UX | 239380 | 167950 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 10000 Mbps | Up to 10000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.3 | 6.0 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Tensor | Tensor |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Tensor G4 AND Tensor G5
The charts below visualize how Tensor G4 and Tensor G5 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Tensor G4 and Tensor G5
Tensor G4 was released 1 year, 7 days earlier than Tensor G5.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Tensor G4 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Tensor G5. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark and Graphics. The Tensor G5 is the better fit if your top priority is CPU.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.