T7300 VS Tensor G6
We are comparing the T7300 (Unisoc) with the Tensor G6 (Google). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: August 24, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF T7300 AND Tensor G6
Here’s how T7300 and Tensor G6 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Tensor G6 is the best choice:
-
202% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1933536 vs 640000)
-
190% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2677 vs 924)
-
226% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (7321 vs 2249)
-
87% higher CPU frequency (4110 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
-
3900% faster download speed (12000 Mbps vs 300 Mbps)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF T7300 AND Tensor G6
Below is the detailed specification table comparing T7300 and Tensor G6.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | T7300 | Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | T7300 | Tensor G6 |
| Brand: | Unisoc | |
| Class: | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Release Date: | July 21, 2025 | August 12, 2026 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.3-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 7 |
| CPU Architecture: | 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x 4.11 GHz C1-Ultra, 4x 3.38 GHz C1-Pro, 2x 2.65 GHz C1-Pro |
| CPU Frequency: | 2200 MHz | 4110 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Valhall 1st gen | PowerVR C-Series |
| GPU Frequency: | 950 MHz | 1286 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 2 | 6 |
| Shading Units: | 32 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 121.6 Gigaflops | 1975.2 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 2133 MHz | — |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 17.07 Gb/s | — |
| Memory Bus Width: | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 924 | 2677 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2249 | 7321 |
| GPU (V6) | — | 6216 |
| Asset Compression | — | 323.9 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | — | 226.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | — | 278.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | — | 166.7 images/sec |
| HDR | — | 226.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | — | 28.7 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | — | 73.3 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | — | 8.44 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 640000 | 1933536 |
| CPU | 265400 | 876037 |
| GPU | 41900 | 288736 |
| MEM | 131500 | 304202 |
| UX | 201200 | 464561 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 510000 | 1856183 |
| CPU | 211193 | 840990 |
| GPU | 33397 | 277185 |
| MEM | 104663 | 292032 |
| UX | 160747 | 445976 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | — | 3380 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Modem: | LTE Cat. 7 DL / Cat. 13 UL | MediaTek M90 |
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 12000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.4 | 6.0 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | 7th-gen Vivimagic Imaging Engine | Fifth-gen Tensor Processing Unit |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF T7300 AND Tensor G6
The charts below visualize how T7300 and Tensor G6 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Tensor G6 dominates overall compared to the T7300. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.