T7300 VS Tensor G6

We are comparing the T7300 (Unisoc) with the Tensor G6 (Google). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.

Last Updated: August 24, 2026

T7300

Unisoc

VS

KEY DIFFERENCES OF T7300 AND Tensor G6

Here’s how T7300 and Tensor G6 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.

Tensor G6: 5 advantages

Why Tensor G6 is the best choice:

5
  • 202% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1933536 vs 640000)
  • 190% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2677 vs 924)
  • 226% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (7321 vs 2249)
  • 87% higher CPU frequency (4110 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
  • 3900% faster download speed (12000 Mbps vs 300 Mbps)

SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF T7300 AND Tensor G6

Below is the detailed specification table comparing T7300 and Tensor G6.

Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.

If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.

Specification T7300 Tensor G6
General Information
Name: T7300 Tensor G6
Brand: Unisoc Google
Class: Mid-range Flagship
Release Date: July 21, 2025 August 12, 2026
Foundry: TSMC TSMC
Instruction Set: ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.3-A
CPU
CPU Cores: 8 7
CPU Architecture: 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 1x 4.11 GHz C1-Ultra, 4x 3.38 GHz C1-Pro, 2x 2.65 GHz C1-Pro
CPU Frequency: 2200 MHz 4110 MHz
Graphics (GPU)
GPU Model: Arm Mali-G57 MC2 PowerVR CXTP-48-1536
Graphics Architecture: Valhall 1st gen PowerVR C-Series
GPU Frequency: 950 MHz 1286 MHz
GPU Pipelines: 2 6
Shading Units: 32 128
GPU FLOPS: 121.6 Gigaflops 1975.2 Gigaflops
Memory Subsystem
Memory Type: LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Max Memory Size: 6 GB 16 GB
Memory Frequency: 2133 MHz
Memory Bandwidth: 17.07 Gb/s
Memory Bus Width: 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Benchmark Scores
GEEKBENCH
Single-Core (V6) 924 2677
Multi-Core (V6) 2249 7321
GPU (V6) 6216
Asset Compression 323.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 226.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 278.6 Mpixels/sec
Image Detection 166.7 images/sec
HDR 226.3 Mpixels/sec
Background Blur 28.7 images/sec
Photo Processing 73.3 images/sec
Ray Tracing 8.44 Mpixels/sec
ANTUTU SCORE
Overall (AnTuTu V11) 640000 1933536
CPU 265400 876037
GPU 41900 288736
MEM 131500 304202
UX 201200 464561
Overall (AnTuTu V10) 510000 1856183
CPU 211193 840990
GPU 33397 277185
MEM 104663 292032
UX 160747 445976
3DMARK
Score 3380
Connectivity & I/O
Modem: LTE Cat. 7 DL / Cat. 13 UL MediaTek M90
Cellular Download Speed: Up to 300 Mbps Up to 12000 Mbps
Wi-Fi Version: Wi-Fi 5 Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth Version: 5.4 6.0
AI & Acceleration
Neural Processor: 7th-gen Vivimagic Imaging Engine Fifth-gen Tensor Processing Unit

Tip: indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while indicates a lower-is-better advantage.

PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF T7300 AND Tensor G6

The charts below visualize how T7300 and Tensor G6 stack up in key performance metrics.

Radar Chart Comparison

Category scores overview (0 to 100)
T7300
Tensor G6

Bullet Chart Comparison

Market Top is the best score found. Colored bars are % of market top (0 to 100).
Market Top
T7300
Tensor G6

Release Timeline of T7300 and Tensor G6

T7300
387 days
Tensor G6

T7300 was released 1 year, 22 days earlier than Tensor G6.

Domain Score Summary

Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.

T7300 Tensor G6
ALL
Overall
Difference: 17
Leads
T7300
65
Tensor G6
82
Benchmark
Difference: 17
Leads
T7300
59
Tensor G6
76
CPU
Difference: 25
Leads
T7300
51
Tensor G6
76
Graphics
Difference: 13
Leads
T7300
58
Tensor G6
71
Memory
Difference: 29
Leads
T7300
59
Tensor G6
88
Connectivity
Difference: 22
Leads
T7300
73
Tensor G6
95

Our Verdict

In conclusion, the Tensor G6 dominates overall compared to the T7300. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.

Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC

Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.

Select either soc below to choose which one stays in the comparison.

Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.