Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 VS Snapdragon 685
We are comparing the Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 ( Qualcomm ) head-to-head with the Snapdragon 685 ( Qualcomm ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Note: This comparison of Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 vs. Snapdragon 685 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: July 4, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 AND Snapdragon 685
Here’s how Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 and Snapdragon 685 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which chipset excels where.
Why Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 is the best choice:
-
48% higher AnTuTu V11 score (690382 vs 467392)
-
95% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (910 vs 466)
-
44% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (2009 vs 1396)
-
4% higher CPU frequency (2900 MHz vs 2800 MHz)
-
644% faster download speed (2900 Mbps vs 390 Mbps)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 AND Snapdragon 685
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 and Snapdragon 685.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Snapdragon 685 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Snapdragon 685 |
| Brand: | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Class: | Entry-Level | Entry-Level |
| Release Date: | December 15, 2025 | March 23, 2023 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 4x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A73, 4x 1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 | 4x 2.8 GHz Cortex-A73, 4x 1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| CPU Frequency: | 2900 MHz | 2800 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency: | 950 MHz | 1260 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 1 | 1 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 243.2 | 322.6 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Max Memory Size: | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 17 Gb/s | 17 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 910 | 466 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2009 | 1396 |
| GPU (V6) | — | 381 |
| Asset Compression | 157.5 MB/sec | 97.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 69.4 pages/sec | 29.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 111.9 Mpixels/sec | 56.4 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 56.4 images/sec | 16.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 91.7 Mpixels/sec | 51.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 9.89 images/sec | 2.93 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 26.8 images/sec | 11.2 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.35 Mpixels/sec | 2.83 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 690382 | 467392 |
| CPU | 318109 | 173114 |
| GPU | 114891 | 29765 |
| MEM | 158134 | 153315 |
| UX | 217957 | 111198 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 348982 |
| CPU | — | 116467 |
| GPU | — | 43728 |
| MEM | — | 109871 |
| UX | — | 78916 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 2900 Mbps | Up to 390 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.2 | 5.2 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 AND Snapdragon 685
The charts below visualize how Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 and Snapdragon 685 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 edges out overall compared to the Snapdragon 685. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU and Graphics. They are still fairly close in Memory and Connectivity.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.