Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 VS Exynos 1680
We are comparing the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 (Qualcomm) with the Exynos 1680 (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: August 23, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 AND Exynos 1680
Here’s how Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 and Exynos 1680 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Exynos 1680 is the best choice:
-
37% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1390055 vs 1012134)
-
18% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (1389 vs 1180)
-
27% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (4453 vs 3501)
-
12% higher CPU frequency (2900 MHz vs 2600 MHz)
-
82% faster download speed (5100 Mbps vs 2800 Mbps)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 AND Exynos 1680
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 and Exynos 1680.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Exynos 1680 |
| Brand: | Qualcomm | Samsung |
| Class: | Mid range | Mid-range |
| Release Date: | May 7, 2026 | March 25, 2026 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720, 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Frequency: | 2600 MHz | 2900 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Qualcomm Adreno | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Adreno | RDNA 3 |
| GPU Frequency: | — | 1200 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | — | 2 |
| Shading Units: | — | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | — | 1228.8 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 3200 MHz | — |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 25.6 Gb/s | — |
| Memory Bus Width: | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1180 | 1389 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3501 | 4453 |
| GPU (V6) | 4253 | 7924 |
| Asset Compression | — | 212.5 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | — | 125.8 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | — | 144.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | — | 86.1 images/sec |
| HDR | — | 141.1 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | — | 18 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | — | 39.6 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | — | 5.87 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1012134 | 1390055 |
| CPU | 346653 | 510705 |
| GPU | 215437 | 374535 |
| MEM | 193352 | 204469 |
| UX | 256692 | 300346 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1017783 | — |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Modem: | Qualcomm 5G Modem-RF System | — |
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 2800 Mbps | Up to 5100 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 6.1 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Hexagon | NPU |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | — | 19.6 TOPS |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 AND Exynos 1680
The charts below visualize how Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 and Exynos 1680 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Exynos 1680 is slightly better overall compared to the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.