Kirin 9050 Pro VS Exynos 2600

We are comparing the Kirin 9050 Pro (HiSilicon) with the Exynos 2600 (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.

Last Updated: September 8, 2026

KEY DIFFERENCES OF Kirin 9050 Pro AND Exynos 2600

Here’s how Kirin 9050 Pro and Exynos 2600 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.

Exynos 2600: 4 advantages

Why Exynos 2600 is the best choice:

4
  • 136% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (3455 vs 1464)
  • 131% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (11621 vs 5037)
  • 23% higher CPU frequency (3800 MHz vs 3100 MHz)
  • 1.3× more GPU pipelines (8 vs 6)

SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Kirin 9050 Pro AND Exynos 2600

Below is the detailed specification table comparing Kirin 9050 Pro and Exynos 2600.

Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.

If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.

Specification Kirin 9050 Pro Exynos 2600
General Information
Name: Kirin 9050 Pro Exynos 2600
Brand: HiSilicon Samsung
Class: Flagship High-End
Release Date: September 7, 2026 December 19, 2025
Foundry: Samsung Foundry
Instruction Set: ARMv8-A ARMv9.3-A
CPU
CPU Cores: 9 10
CPU Architecture: 1x 3.1 GHz LinxiCore Prime, 2x 2.7 GHz LinxiCore Performance, 4x 2.2 GHz LinxiCore Efficiency, 2x 1.75 GHz LinxiCore Little 1x 3.8 GHz C1-Ultra, 3x 3.25 GHz C1-Pro, 6x 2.75 GHz C1-Pro
CPU Frequency: 3100 MHz 3800 MHz
Graphics (GPU)
GPU Model: Maleoon 955 Samsung Xclipse 960
Graphics Architecture: Maleoon RDNA 4
GPU Frequency: 1056 MHz 980 MHz
GPU Pipelines: 6 8
Shading Units: 128
GPU FLOPS: 4014.1 Gigaflops
Memory Subsystem
Memory Type: LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Max Memory Size: 16 GB 24 GB
Memory Bandwidth: 64 Gb/s
Memory Bus Width: 4x 16 Bit
Benchmark Scores
GEEKBENCH
Single-Core (V6) 1464 3455
Multi-Core (V6) 5037 11621
GPU (V6) 27627
Asset Compression 186.4 MB/sec 459.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 152.5 pages/sec 328.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 141.7 Mpixels/sec 345 Mpixels/sec
Image Detection 259.1 images/sec
HDR 127.9 Mpixels/sec 344.2 Mpixels/sec
Background Blur 18.5 images/sec 41.7 images/sec
Photo Processing 97.1 images/sec
Ray Tracing 5.83 Mpixels/sec 12.2 Mpixels/sec
ANTUTU SCORE
Overall (AnTuTu V11) 3161830
CPU 1060612
GPU 1200578
MEM 409429
UX 491211
Overall (AnTuTu V10) 3115908
CPU 991772
GPU 1258872
MEM 554880
UX 310384
Connectivity & I/O
Cellular Download Speed: Up to 15000 Mbps
Wi-Fi Version: Wi-Fi 7 Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth Version: 6.0 6.0
AI & Acceleration
Neural Processor: Da Vinci NPU AI engine with 32K MAC NPU

Tip: indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while indicates a lower-is-better advantage.

PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Kirin 9050 Pro AND Exynos 2600

The charts below visualize how Kirin 9050 Pro and Exynos 2600 stack up in key performance metrics.

Radar Chart Comparison

Category scores overview (0 to 100)
Kirin 9050 Pro
Exynos 2600

Bullet Chart Comparison

Market Top is the best score found. Colored bars are % of market top (0 to 100).
Market Top
Kirin 9050 Pro
Exynos 2600

Release Timeline of Kirin 9050 Pro and Exynos 2600

Exynos 2600
262 days
Kirin 9050 Pro

Exynos 2600 was released 8 months, 19 days earlier than Kirin 9050 Pro.

Domain Score Summary

Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.

Kirin 9050 Pro Exynos 2600
ALL
Overall
Difference: 12
Leads
Kirin 9050 Pro
74
Exynos 2600
86
Benchmark
Difference: 23
Leads
Kirin 9050 Pro
69
Exynos 2600
92
CPU
Difference: 21
Leads
Kirin 9050 Pro
64
Exynos 2600
85
Graphics
Difference: 0
Tie
Kirin 9050 Pro
77
Exynos 2600
77
Memory
Difference: 3
Leads
Kirin 9050 Pro
87
Exynos 2600
90

Our Verdict

In conclusion, the Exynos 2600 is clearly better overall compared to the Kirin 9050 Pro. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU and Memory. They are still fairly close in Graphics.

Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC

Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.

Select either soc below to choose which one stays in the comparison.

Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.