Kirin 9035 VS Kirin 9050 Pro
We are comparing the Kirin 9035 (HiSilicon) with the Kirin 9050 Pro (HiSilicon). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: October 7, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Kirin 9035 AND Kirin 9050 Pro
Here’s how Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9050 Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Kirin 9050 Pro is the best choice:
-
4% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1882468 vs 1811490)
-
17% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (1636 vs 1398)
-
5% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (5775 vs 5510)
-
9% higher CPU frequency (3100 MHz vs 2850 MHz)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Kirin 9035 AND Kirin 9050 Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9050 Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Kirin 9035 | Kirin 9050 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Kirin 9035 | Kirin 9050 Pro |
| Brand: | HiSilicon | HiSilicon |
| Class: | Flagship | Flagship |
| Release Date: | October 1, 2026 | September 7, 2026 |
| Foundry: | SMIC | — |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 9 | 9 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 2.85 GHz, 4x 2.27 GHz, 4x 1.72 GHz | 1x 3.1 GHz LinxiCore Prime, 2x 2.7 GHz LinxiCore Performance, 4x 2.2 GHz LinxiCore Efficiency, 2x 1.75 GHz LinxiCore Little |
| CPU Frequency: | 2850 MHz | 3100 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Maleoon 935 | Maleoon 955 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Maleoon | Maleoon |
| GPU Frequency: | — | 1056 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 6 | 6 |
| Shading Units: | 256 | 256 |
| GPU FLOPS: | — | 3225.6 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 4800 MHz | — |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 76.8 Gb/s | — |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | — |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1398 | 1636 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 5510 | 5775 |
| GPU (V6) | 8098 | 8603 |
| Asset Compression | — | 186.4 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | — | 152.5 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | — | 141.7 Mpixels/sec |
| HDR | — | 127.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | — | 18.5 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | — | 5.83 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1811490 | 1882468 |
| CPU | 541759 | 579000 |
| GPU | 508312 | 543500 |
| MEM | 453112 | 440168 |
| UX | 308307 | 319800 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 7500 Mbps | — |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 6.0 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Da Vinci NPU | Da Vinci NPU |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Kirin 9035 AND Kirin 9050 Pro
The charts below visualize how Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9050 Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Phones Using These Chipsets
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Kirin 9050 Pro has a narrow overall lead compared to the Kirin 9035. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark and CPU. The Kirin 9035 is the better fit if your top priority is Memory.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Frequently Asked Questions about Kirin 9035 vs Kirin 9050 Pro
Kirin 9050 Pro scores 17% higher than Kirin 9035 in Geekbench 6 single-core (1,636 vs 1,398). Kirin 9050 Pro scores 4.8% higher than Kirin 9035 in Geekbench 6 multi-core (5,775 vs 5,510).
Kirin 9050 Pro scores 3.9% higher than Kirin 9035 in AnTuTu v11 (1,882,468 vs 1,811,490).
Kirin 9035 uses Maleoon 935 graphics, while Kirin 9050 Pro uses Maleoon 955 graphics. Both list Maleoon for GPU architecture.
Both list 9 for CPU core count. Kirin 9035 uses 1x 2.85 GHz, 4x 2.27 GHz, 4x 1.72 GHz, while Kirin 9050 Pro uses 1x 3.1 GHz LinxiCore Prime, 2x 2.7 GHz LinxiCore Performance, 4x 2.2 GHz LinxiCore Efficiency, 2x 1.75 GHz LinxiCore Little.
Both list LPDDR5X for memory type. Both list 16 GB for maximum memory capacity.
Kirin 9035 supports UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 storage, while Kirin 9050 Pro supports UFS 4.0 storage.
Both list Wi-Fi 7 for Wi-Fi. Both list 6.0 for Bluetooth.
Kirin 9035 uses a 5 nm manufacturing process, while Kirin 9050 Pro uses a 3nm manufacturing process.
Both Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9050 Pro support 5G.
Kirin 9035 was released on October 1, 2026. Kirin 9050 Pro was released on September 7, 2026. Kirin 9035 was released 24 days after Kirin 9050 Pro.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.