Helio G100 VS Exynos 2400e
We are comparing the Helio G100 (MediaTek) with the Exynos 2400e (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: August 6, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Helio G100 AND Exynos 2400e
Here’s how Helio G100 and Exynos 2400e stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Exynos 2400e is the best choice:
-
242% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1971406 vs 576015)
-
182% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2051 vs 727)
-
232% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (6690 vs 2014)
-
1.3× more CPU cores (10 vs 8)
-
41% higher CPU frequency (3110 MHz vs 2200 MHz)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Helio G100 AND Exynos 2400e
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Helio G100 and Exynos 2400e.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Helio G100 | Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Helio G100 | Exynos 2400e |
| Brand: | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Class: | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Release Date: | August 7, 2024 | September 26, 2024 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 10 |
| CPU Architecture: | 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76, 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x 3.11 GHz Cortex-X4, 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Frequency: | 2200 MHz | 3110 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Mali-G57 MP2 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Valhall 1st gen | RDNA 3 |
| GPU Frequency: | 1000 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 2 | 6 |
| Shading Units: | 32 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 128 Gigaflops | 3406.8 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 2133 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 17 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 727 | 2051 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 2014 | 6690 |
| GPU (V6) | 1471 | 16611 |
| Asset Compression | 99.5 MB/sec | 270.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 50.8 pages/sec | 202.5 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 67.7 Mpixels/sec | 196.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 38.9 images/sec | 150.7 images/sec |
| HDR | 61.8 Mpixels/sec | 200.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 5.54 images/sec | 23.6 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 17.3 images/sec | 59.3 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.88 Mpixels/sec | 7.7 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 576015 | 1971406 |
| CPU | 219745 | 675688 |
| GPU | 48086 | 653205 |
| MEM | 136525 | 234506 |
| UX | 171659 | 408007 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 430430 | 1625873 |
| CPU | 139063 | 400082 |
| GPU | 66850 | 698721 |
| MEM | 113619 | 238234 |
| UX | 110898 | 288836 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | 146 | 1769 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Modem: | — | Exynos 5400 |
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 650 Mbps | Up to 9640 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.4 | 5.3 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | NPU | NPU |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Helio G100 AND Exynos 2400e
The charts below visualize how Helio G100 and Exynos 2400e stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Helio G100 and Exynos 2400e
Helio G100 was released 1 month, 19 days earlier than Exynos 2400e.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Exynos 2400e dominates overall compared to the Helio G100. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.