Exynos 2600 VS Dimensity 9500s
We are comparing the Exynos 2600 (Samsung) with the Dimensity 9500s (MediaTek). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: August 24, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Exynos 2600 AND Dimensity 9500s
Here’s how Exynos 2600 and Dimensity 9500s stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Exynos 2600
-
4% higher AnTuTu V11 score (3161830 vs 3037573)
-
29% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (3455 vs 2680)
-
39% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (11621 vs 8358)
-
1.3× more CPU cores (10 vs 8)
-
2% higher CPU frequency (3800 MHz vs 3730 MHz)
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 9500s
-
33% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 GB/s vs 64 GB/s)
-
1.5× more GPU pipelines (12 vs 8)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Exynos 2600 AND Dimensity 9500s
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Exynos 2600 and Dimensity 9500s.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Exynos 2600 | Dimensity 9500s |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Exynos 2600 | Dimensity 9500s |
| Brand: | Samsung | MediaTek |
| Class: | High-End | Flagship |
| Release Date: | December 19, 2025 | January 15, 2026 |
| Foundry: | Samsung Foundry | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.3-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 10 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 3.8 GHz C1-Ultra, 3x 3.25 GHz C1-Pro, 6x 2.75 GHz C1-Pro | 1x 3.73 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x 3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 |
| CPU Frequency: | 3800 MHz | 3730 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| Graphics Architecture: | RDNA 4 | Valhall 5th gen |
| GPU Frequency: | 980 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 8 | 12 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 4014.1 Gigaflops | 4952.1 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | — | 5333 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 64 Gb/s | 85.3 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3455 | 2680 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 11621 | 8358 |
| GPU (V6) | 27627 | 20990 |
| Asset Compression | 459.4 MB/sec | 374.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 328.1 pages/sec | 259.5 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 345 Mpixels/sec | 301.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 259.1 images/sec | 231.8 images/sec |
| HDR | 344.2 Mpixels/sec | 267.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 41.7 images/sec | 37.9 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 97.1 images/sec | 86.8 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 12.2 Mpixels/sec | 10 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 3161830 | 3037573 |
| CPU | 1060612 | 894758 |
| GPU | 1200578 | 1062191 |
| MEM | 409429 | 431390 |
| UX | 491211 | 649234 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 3115908 | 3298445 |
| CPU | 991772 | 952789 |
| GPU | 1258872 | 1130421 |
| MEM | 554880 | 502375 |
| UX | 310384 | 712860 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 15000 Mbps | Up to 7300 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 5.4 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU | MediaTek NPU |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Exynos 2600 AND Dimensity 9500s
The charts below visualize how Exynos 2600 and Dimensity 9500s stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Exynos 2600 and Dimensity 9500s
Exynos 2600 was released 27 days earlier than Dimensity 9500s.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Exynos 2600 edges out overall compared to the Dimensity 9500s. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU and Connectivity. The Dimensity 9500s is the better fit if your top priority is Graphics and Memory.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.