Exynos 1680 VS Dimensity 7350
We are comparing the Exynos 1680 (Samsung) with the Dimensity 7350 (MediaTek). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: August 30, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Exynos 1680 AND Dimensity 7350
Here’s how Exynos 1680 and Dimensity 7350 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Exynos 1680
-
34% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1390055 vs 1037400)
-
28% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (1389 vs 1086)
-
45% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (4453 vs 3063)
-
9% faster download speed (5100 Mbps vs 4700 Mbps)
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 7350
-
3% higher CPU frequency (3000 MHz vs 2900 MHz)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Exynos 1680 AND Dimensity 7350
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Exynos 1680 and Dimensity 7350.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Exynos 1680 | Dimensity 7350 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Exynos 1680 | Dimensity 7350 |
| Brand: | Samsung | MediaTek |
| Class: | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Release Date: | March 25, 2026 | July 17, 2024 |
| Foundry: | Samsung | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720, 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x 3 GHz Cortex-A715, 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| CPU Frequency: | 2900 MHz | 3000 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Samsung Xclipse 550 | Arm Mali-G610 MC4 |
| Graphics Architecture: | RDNA 3 | — |
| GPU Frequency: | 1200 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 2 | — |
| Shading Units: | 128 | — |
| GPU FLOPS: | 1228.8 Gigaflops | 665.6 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 |
| Max Memory Size: | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | — | 3200 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | — | 25.6 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1389 | 1086 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 4453 | 3063 |
| GPU (V6) | 7924 | 3304 |
| Asset Compression | 212.5 MB/sec | 174.7 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 125.8 pages/sec | 66.4 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 144.7 Mpixels/sec | 125.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 86.1 images/sec | 54.9 images/sec |
| HDR | 141.1 Mpixels/sec | 104.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 18 images/sec | 10.8 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 39.6 images/sec | 26.7 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 5.87 Mpixels/sec | 4.65 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1390055 | 1037400 |
| CPU | 510705 | 384931 |
| GPU | 374535 | 175276 |
| MEM | 204469 | 172317 |
| UX | 300346 | 304876 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 753533 |
| CPU | — | 227081 |
| GPU | — | 210531 |
| MEM | — | 155451 |
| UX | — | 160470 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | — | 528 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Modem: | — | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 5100 Mbps | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.1 | 5.3 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | NPU | MediaTek NPU 657 |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | 19.6 TOPS | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Exynos 1680 AND Dimensity 7350
The charts below visualize how Exynos 1680 and Dimensity 7350 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Exynos 1680 and Dimensity 7350
Dimensity 7350 was released 1 year, 8 months, 8 days earlier than Exynos 1680.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Exynos 1680 edges out overall compared to the Dimensity 7350. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU, Graphics and Memory. The Dimensity 7350 is the better fit if your top priority is Connectivity.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.