Exynos 1610 VS Tensor G6
We are comparing the Exynos 1610 (Samsung) with the Tensor G6 (Google). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: September 17, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Exynos 1610 AND Tensor G6
Here’s how Exynos 1610 and Tensor G6 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Tensor G6 is the best choice:
-
218% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1933536 vs 608564)
-
178% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2677 vs 963)
-
303% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (7321 vs 1817)
-
71% higher CPU frequency (4110 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
-
1.5× more GPU pipelines (6 vs 4)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Exynos 1610 AND Tensor G6
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Exynos 1610 and Tensor G6.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Exynos 1610 | Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Exynos 1610 | Tensor G6 |
| Brand: | Samsung | |
| Class: | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Release Date: | September 15, 2026 | August 12, 2026 |
| Foundry: | Samsung | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.3-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 7 |
| CPU Architecture: | 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 6x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x 4.11 GHz C1-Ultra, 4x 3.38 GHz C1-Pro, 2x 2.65 GHz C1-Pro |
| CPU Frequency: | 2400 MHz | 4110 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Mali-G68 MP4 | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Valhall 2nd gen | PowerVR C-Series |
| GPU Frequency: | — | 1286 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 4 | 6 |
| Shading Units: | 32 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | — | 1975.2 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 3200 MHz | — |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 25.6 Gb/s | — |
| Memory Bus Width: | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 963 | 2677 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 1817 | 7321 |
| GPU (V6) | 1304 | 6216 |
| Asset Compression | — | 323.9 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | — | 226.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | — | 278.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | — | 166.7 images/sec |
| HDR | — | 226.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | — | 28.7 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | — | 73.3 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | — | 8.44 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 608564 | 1933536 |
| CPU | 262139 | 876037 |
| GPU | 42910 | 288736 |
| MEM | 111676 | 304202 |
| UX | 191839 | 464561 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 1856183 |
| CPU | — | 840990 |
| GPU | — | 277185 |
| MEM | — | 292032 |
| UX | — | 445976 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | — | 3380 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Modem: | — | MediaTek M90 |
| Cellular Download Speed: | — | Up to 12000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.2 | 6.0 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | NPU | Fifth-gen Tensor Processing Unit |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Exynos 1610 AND Tensor G6
The charts below visualize how Exynos 1610 and Tensor G6 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Tensor G6 dominates overall compared to the Exynos 1610. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.