Dimensity 8550 VS Exynos 2500
We are comparing the Dimensity 8550 ( MediaTek ) head-to-head with the Exynos 2500 ( Samsung ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Note: This comparison of Dimensity 8550 vs. Exynos 2500 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 9, 2026
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Dimensity 8550 AND Exynos 2500
Here’s how Dimensity 8550 and Exynos 2500 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which chipset excels where.
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 8550
-
3% higher CPU frequency (3400 MHz vs 3300 MHz)
-
13% higher memory frequency (4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz)
-
13% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s vs 68.2 GB/s)
Reasons to consider the Exynos 2500
-
34% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2352 vs 1761)
-
13% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (8103 vs 7148)
-
1.3× more CPU cores (10 vs 8)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Dimensity 8550 AND Exynos 2500
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Dimensity 8550 and Exynos 2500.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Dimensity 8550 | Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Dimensity 8550 | Exynos 2500 |
| Brand: | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Class: | Mid-range | High-End |
| Release Date: | May 27, 2026 | June 23, 2025 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 10 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 3.4 GHz Cortex-A725, 3x 3.2 GHz Cortex-A725, 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1x 3.3 GHz Cortex-X925, 2x 2.74 GHz Cortex-A725, 5x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A725, 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Frequency: | 3400 MHz | 3300 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Mali-G720 MP8 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| Graphics Architecture: | 5th gen | RDNA 3 |
| GPU Frequency: | 1508 MHz | 999 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 8 | 8 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 3088.4 Gigaflops | 4091.9 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 4800 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 76.8 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1761 | 2352 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 7148 | 8103 |
| GPU (V6) | 15891 | 25840 |
| Asset Compression | — | 390.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | — | 179.4 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | — | 218.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | — | 247.5 images/sec |
| HDR | — | 309 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | — | 36.4 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | — | 89.9 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | — | 12.7 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2429134 | 2437711 |
| CPU | 612932 | 822434 |
| GPU | 952016 | 817393 |
| MEM | 394012 | 339157 |
| UX | 470174 | 458727 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 2047807 |
| CPU | — | 486530 |
| GPU | — | 828627 |
| MEM | — | 441040 |
| UX | — | 291610 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | — | Up to 12000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.4 | 5.4 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | MediaTek NPU 880 | Samsung NPU |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | — | 59 TOPS |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Dimensity 8550 AND Exynos 2500
The charts below visualize how Dimensity 8550 and Exynos 2500 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Dimensity 8550 and Exynos 2500
Exynos 2500 was released 11 months, 4 days earlier than Dimensity 8550.
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Exynos 2500 edges out overall compared to the Dimensity 8550. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU and Graphics. The Dimensity 8550 is the better fit if your top priority is Memory.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.