Dimensity 8550 VS Exynos 2400e
We are comparing the Dimensity 8550 ( MediaTek ) head-to-head with the Exynos 2400e ( Samsung ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Note: This comparison of Dimensity 8550 vs. Exynos 2400e is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 9, 2026
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Dimensity 8550 AND Exynos 2400e
Here’s how Dimensity 8550 and Exynos 2400e stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which chipset excels where.
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 8550
-
23% higher AnTuTu V11 score (2429134 vs 1971406)
-
7% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (7148 vs 6690)
-
9% higher CPU frequency (3400 MHz vs 3110 MHz)
-
14% higher memory frequency (4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz)
-
13% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s vs 68.2 GB/s)
Reasons to consider the Exynos 2400e
-
16% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2051 vs 1761)
-
1.3× more CPU cores (10 vs 8)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Dimensity 8550 AND Exynos 2400e
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Dimensity 8550 and Exynos 2400e.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Dimensity 8550 | Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Dimensity 8550 | Exynos 2400e |
| Brand: | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Class: | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Release Date: | May 27, 2026 | September 26, 2024 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 10 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 3.4 GHz Cortex-A725, 3x 3.2 GHz Cortex-A725, 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1x 3.11 GHz Cortex-X4, 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Frequency: | 3400 MHz | 3110 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Mali-G720 MP8 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| Graphics Architecture: | 5th gen | RDNA 3 |
| GPU Frequency: | 1508 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 8 | 6 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 3088.4 Gigaflops | 3406.8 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 76.8 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1761 | 2051 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 7148 | 6690 |
| GPU (V6) | 15891 | 16611 |
| Asset Compression | — | 270.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | — | 202.5 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | — | 196.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | — | 150.7 images/sec |
| HDR | — | 200.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | — | 23.6 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | — | 59.3 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | — | 7.7 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2429134 | 1971406 |
| CPU | 612932 | 675688 |
| GPU | 952016 | 653205 |
| MEM | 394012 | 234506 |
| UX | 470174 | 408007 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 1625873 |
| CPU | — | 400082 |
| GPU | — | 698721 |
| MEM | — | 238234 |
| UX | — | 288836 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | — | 1769 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | — | Up to 9640 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.4 | 5.3 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | MediaTek NPU 880 | NPU |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Dimensity 8550 AND Exynos 2400e
The charts below visualize how Dimensity 8550 and Exynos 2400e stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Dimensity 8550 and Exynos 2400e
Exynos 2400e was released 1 year, 8 months, 1 day earlier than Dimensity 8550.
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Dimensity 8550 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Exynos 2400e. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, Graphics and Memory. They are still fairly close in CPU.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.