Dimensity 8050 VS Dimensity 8020
We are comparing the Dimensity 8050 (MediaTek) with the Dimensity 8020 (MediaTek). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: April 6, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Dimensity 8050 AND Dimensity 8020
Here’s how Dimensity 8050 and Dimensity 8020 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 8050
-
6% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1028453 vs 969978)
-
15% higher CPU frequency (3000 MHz vs 2600 MHz)
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 8020
-
2% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (1120 vs 1097)
-
9% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (3665 vs 3359)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Dimensity 8050 AND Dimensity 8020
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Dimensity 8050 and Dimensity 8020.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Dimensity 8050 | Dimensity 8020 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Dimensity 8050 | Dimensity 8020 |
| Brand: | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Class: | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Release Date: | May 9, 2023 | April 28, 2023 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 1x 3 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| CPU Frequency: | 3000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Arm Mali-G77 MC9 | Arm Mali-G77 MC9 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Valhall 1st gen | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency: | 886 MHz | 836 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 9 | 9 |
| Shading Units: | 32 | 32 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 510.3 Gigaflops | 481.5 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 34.1 Gb/s | 34.1 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1097 | 1120 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3359 | 3665 |
| GPU (V6) | 4802 | 4765 |
| Asset Compression | 163.8 MB/sec | 172.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 96.3 pages/sec | 99.4 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 128.8 Mpixels/sec | 132.4 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 69.7 images/sec | 78.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 117.2 Mpixels/sec | 125.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 9.86 images/sec | 12.3 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 33.4 images/sec | 36.1 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.59 Mpixels/sec | 4.75 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1028453 | 969978 |
| CPU | 375320 | 339962 |
| GPU | 153443 | 130972 |
| MEM | 187980 | 196071 |
| UX | 311710 | 302973 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 767039 | 747153 |
| CPU | 215088 | 224464 |
| GPU | 212750 | 190597 |
| MEM | 157220 | 142332 |
| UX | 181981 | 189760 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | 445 | 434 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 4700 Mbps | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.2 | 5.2 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | MediaTek APU 570 | MediaTek APU 570 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Dimensity 8050 AND Dimensity 8020
The charts below visualize how Dimensity 8050 and Dimensity 8020 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Dimensity 8050 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Dimensity 8020. Its strongest advantages are in CPU. They are still fairly close in Benchmark, Graphics, Memory and Connectivity.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.