Dimensity 7500 VS Tensor G6
We are comparing the Dimensity 7500 (MediaTek) with the Tensor G6 (Google). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: September 13, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Dimensity 7500 AND Tensor G6
Here’s how Dimensity 7500 and Tensor G6 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Tensor G6 is the best choice:
-
64% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1933536 vs 1176492)
-
137% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (2677 vs 1130)
-
94% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (7321 vs 3783)
-
58% higher CPU frequency (4110 MHz vs 2600 MHz)
-
131% faster download speed (12000 Mbps vs 5200 Mbps)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Dimensity 7500 AND Tensor G6
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Dimensity 7500 and Tensor G6.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Dimensity 7500 | Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Dimensity 7500 | Tensor G6 |
| Brand: | MediaTek | |
| Class: | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Release Date: | May 29, 2026 | August 12, 2026 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.3-A | ARMv9.3-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 7 |
| CPU Architecture: | 4x 2.6 GHz C1 Pro, 4x 2 GHz C1 Nano | 1x 4.11 GHz C1-Ultra, 4x 3.38 GHz C1-Pro, 2x 2.65 GHz C1-Pro |
| CPU Frequency: | 2600 MHz | 4110 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Mali-G625 MP2 | PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 |
| Graphics Architecture: | 5th gen | PowerVR C-Series |
| GPU Frequency: | — | 1286 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 2 | 6 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | — | 1975.2 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 3200 MHz | — |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 25.6 Gb/s | — |
| Memory Bus Width: | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1130 | 2677 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3783 | 7321 |
| GPU (V6) | 3781 | 6216 |
| Asset Compression | — | 323.9 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | — | 226.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | — | 278.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | — | 166.7 images/sec |
| HDR | — | 226.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | — | 28.7 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | — | 73.3 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | — | 8.44 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1176492 | 1933536 |
| CPU | 437067 | 876037 |
| GPU | 191900 | 288736 |
| MEM | 249776 | 304202 |
| UX | 297749 | 464561 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 1856183 |
| CPU | — | 840990 |
| GPU | — | 277185 |
| MEM | — | 292032 |
| UX | — | 445976 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | — | 3380 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Modem: | — | MediaTek M90 |
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 5200 Mbps | Up to 12000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.4 | 6.0 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | MediaTek NPU 850 | Fifth-gen Tensor Processing Unit |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Dimensity 7500 AND Tensor G6
The charts below visualize how Dimensity 7500 and Tensor G6 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Tensor G6 is clearly better overall compared to the Dimensity 7500. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.