Dimensity 7500 VS Kirin 9010
We are comparing the Dimensity 7500 ( MediaTek ) head-to-head with the Kirin 9010 ( HiSilicon ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Note: This comparison of Dimensity 7500 vs. Kirin 9010 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 12, 2026
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Dimensity 7500 AND Kirin 9010
Here’s how Dimensity 7500 and Kirin 9010 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which chipset excels where.
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 7500
-
13% higher CPU frequency (2600 MHz vs 2300 MHz)
-
13% faster download speed (5200 Mbps vs 4600 Mbps)
Reasons to consider the Kirin 9010
-
26% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (1421 vs 1130)
-
14% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (4323 vs 3783)
-
33% higher memory frequency (4266 MHz vs 3200 MHz)
-
166% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s)
-
2.0× more GPU pipelines (4 vs 2)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Dimensity 7500 AND Kirin 9010
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Dimensity 7500 and Kirin 9010.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Dimensity 7500 | Kirin 9010 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Dimensity 7500 | Kirin 9010 |
| Brand: | MediaTek | HiSilicon |
| Class: | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Release Date: | May 29, 2026 | April 18, 2024 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | SMIC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.3-A | ARMv8-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 4x 2.6 GHz C1 Pro, 4x 2 GHz C1 Nano | 1x 2.3 GHz TaiShan V121, 3x 2.18 GHz TaiShan V121, 4x 1.55 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| CPU Frequency: | 2600 MHz | 2300 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Mali-G625 MP2 | Maleoon 910 |
| Graphics Architecture: | 5th gen | Maleoon |
| GPU Frequency: | — | 750 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 2 | 4 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 256 |
| GPU FLOPS: | — | 1536 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 3200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 25.6 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1130 | 1421 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3783 | 4323 |
| GPU (V6) | 3781 | 2655 |
| Asset Compression | — | 170.6 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | — | 126.9 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | — | 142.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | — | 81.5 images/sec |
| HDR | — | 120.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | — | 12.3 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | — | 43.8 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | — | 5.08 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1176492 | 1177196 |
| CPU | 437067 | 512832 |
| GPU | 191900 | 131160 |
| MEM | 249776 | 270499 |
| UX | 297749 | 262705 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | — | 973352 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | — | 1393 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 5200 Mbps | Up to 4600 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.4 | 5.2 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | MediaTek NPU 850 | Da Vinci NPU |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Dimensity 7500 AND Kirin 9010
The charts below visualize how Dimensity 7500 and Kirin 9010 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Kirin 9010 is slightly better overall compared to the Dimensity 7500. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU, Graphics and Memory. The Dimensity 7500 is the better fit if your top priority is Connectivity.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.