Dimensity 7500 VS Exynos 1680
We are comparing the Dimensity 7500 ( MediaTek ) head-to-head with the Exynos 1680 ( Samsung ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Note: This comparison of Dimensity 7500 vs. Exynos 1680 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 21, 2026
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Dimensity 7500 AND Exynos 1680
Here’s how Dimensity 7500 and Exynos 1680 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which chipset excels where.
Reasons to consider the Dimensity 7500
-
2% faster download speed (5200 Mbps vs 5100 Mbps)
Reasons to consider the Exynos 1680
-
18% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1390055 vs 1176492)
-
23% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (1389 vs 1130)
-
18% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (4453 vs 3783)
-
12% higher CPU frequency (2900 MHz vs 2600 MHz)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Dimensity 7500 AND Exynos 1680
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Dimensity 7500 and Exynos 1680.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Dimensity 7500 | Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | Dimensity 7500 | Exynos 1680 |
| Brand: | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Class: | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Release Date: | May 29, 2026 | March 25, 2026 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.3-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 8 | 8 |
| CPU Architecture: | 4x 2.6 GHz C1 Pro, 4x 2 GHz C1 Nano | 1x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720, 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Frequency: | 2600 MHz | 2900 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Mali-G625 MP2 | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| Graphics Architecture: | 5th gen | RDNA 3 |
| GPU Frequency: | — | 1200 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 2 | 2 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | — | 1228.8 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 3200 MHz | — |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 25.6 Gb/s | — |
| Memory Bus Width: | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 1130 | 1389 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 3783 | 4453 |
| GPU (V6) | 3781 | 7924 |
| Asset Compression | — | 212.5 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | — | 125.8 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | — | 144.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | — | 86.1 images/sec |
| HDR | — | 141.1 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | — | 18 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | — | 39.6 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | — | 5.87 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1176492 | 1390055 |
| CPU | 437067 | 510705 |
| GPU | 191900 | 374535 |
| MEM | 249776 | 204469 |
| UX | 297749 | 300346 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 5200 Mbps | Up to 5100 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.4 | 6.1 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | MediaTek NPU 850 | NPU |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | — | 19.6 TOPS |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Dimensity 7500 AND Exynos 1680
The charts below visualize how Dimensity 7500 and Exynos 1680 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Dimensity 7500 and Exynos 1680
Exynos 1680 was released 2 months, 4 days earlier than Dimensity 7500.
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Exynos 1680 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Dimensity 7500. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU and Graphics. The Dimensity 7500 is the better fit if your top priority is Memory.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.