A15 Bionic VS A20 Pro
We are comparing the A15 Bionic (Apple) with the A20 Pro (Apple). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: September 10, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF A15 Bionic AND A20 Pro
Here’s how A15 Bionic and A20 Pro stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why A20 Pro is the best choice:
-
108% higher AnTuTu V11 score (2935466 vs 1412655)
-
83% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (4259 vs 2330)
-
128% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (13093 vs 5734)
-
52% higher CPU frequency (4900 MHz vs 3230 MHz)
-
150% higher memory frequency (5333 MHz vs 2133 MHz)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF A15 Bionic AND A20 Pro
Below is the detailed specification table comparing A15 Bionic and A20 Pro.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | A15 Bionic | A20 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | A15 Bionic | A20 Pro |
| Brand: | Apple | Apple |
| Class: | Mid-End | Flagship |
| Release Date: | September 14, 2021 | September 9, 2026 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv8.5-A | — |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 6 | 6 |
| CPU Architecture: | 2x 3.23 GHz Avalanche + 4x 2.02 GHz Blizzard | 2x 4.9 GHz Everest, 4x Sawtooth |
| CPU Frequency: | 3230 MHz | 4900 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Apple A15 Bionic GPU | Apple A20 Pro GPU |
| Graphics Architecture: | Apple Bionic | Apple A GPU |
| GPU Frequency: | 1338 MHz | — |
| GPU Pipelines: | 5 | 7 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 1712.6 Gigaflops | — |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 34.1 Gb/s | 113.7 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 6x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2330 | 4259 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 5734 | 13093 |
| GPU (V6) | — | 51120 |
| Asset Compression | 203.3 MB/sec | — |
| HTML 5 Browser | 124.4 pages/sec | — |
| PDF Renderer | 143.5 Mpixels/sec | — |
| Image Detection | 130 images/sec | — |
| HDR | 169.9 Mpixels/sec | — |
| Background Blur | 22.2 images/sec | — |
| Photo Processing | 60.2 images/sec | — |
| Ray Tracing | 5.93 Mpixels/sec | — |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1412655 | 2935466 |
| CPU | 419310 | 882877 |
| GPU | 378571 | 1051925 |
| MEM | 144604 | 262172 |
| UX | 470170 | 738492 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1359073 | — |
| CPU | 328469 | — |
| GPU | 508708 | — |
| MEM | 207418 | — |
| UX | 314478 | — |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | 9395 | — |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 7500 Mbps | — |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.0 | 6.0 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Apple Neural Engine | Dual 16-core Apple Neural Engine |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | 16 TOPS | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF A15 Bionic AND A20 Pro
The charts below visualize how A15 Bionic and A20 Pro stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of A15 Bionic and A20 Pro
A15 Bionic was released 4 years, 11 months, 26 days earlier than A20 Pro.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the A20 Pro dominates overall compared to the A15 Bionic. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.