A15 Bionic VS A18
We are comparing the A15 Bionic (Apple) with the A18 (Apple). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: May 9, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF A15 Bionic AND A18
Here’s how A15 Bionic and A18 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why A18 is the best choice:
-
36% higher AnTuTu V11 score (1918031 vs 1412655)
-
47% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (3433 vs 2330)
-
52% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (8692 vs 5734)
-
25% higher CPU frequency (4050 MHz vs 3230 MHz)
-
76% higher memory frequency (3750 MHz vs 2133 MHz)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF A15 Bionic AND A18
Below is the detailed specification table comparing A15 Bionic and A18.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | A15 Bionic | A18 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | A15 Bionic | A18 |
| Brand: | Apple | Apple |
| Class: | Mid-End | High-End |
| Release Date: | September 14, 2021 | September 9, 2024 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv8.5-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 6 | 6 |
| CPU Architecture: | 2x 3.23 GHz Avalanche + 4x 2.02 GHz Blizzard | 2x 4.04 GHz, 4x 2.42 GHz |
| CPU Frequency: | 3230 MHz | 4050 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Apple A15 Bionic GPU | Apple A18 GPU |
| Graphics Architecture: | Apple Bionic | Apple Bionic |
| GPU Frequency: | 1338 MHz | 1490 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 5 | 5 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 1712.6 Gigaflops | 1907 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 2133 MHz | 3750 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 34.1 Gb/s | 60 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2330 | 3433 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 5734 | 8692 |
| Asset Compression | 203.3 MB/sec | 286.8 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 124.4 pages/sec | 184.2 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 143.5 Mpixels/sec | 201.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 130 images/sec | 297.2 images/sec |
| HDR | 169.9 Mpixels/sec | 279.1 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 22.2 images/sec | 36.2 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 60.2 images/sec | 90 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 5.93 Mpixels/sec | 8.68 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1412655 | 1918031 |
| CPU | 419310 | 601640 |
| GPU | 378571 | 587216 |
| MEM | 144604 | 164895 |
| UX | 470170 | 564280 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1359073 | 1683923 |
| CPU | 328469 | 452290 |
| GPU | 508708 | 690909 |
| MEM | 207418 | 179383 |
| UX | 314478 | 361341 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | 9395 | — |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 7500 Mbps | Up to 10000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.0 | 5.3 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Apple Neural Engine | Neural Engine |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | 16 TOPS | 35 TOPS |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF A15 Bionic AND A18
The charts below visualize how A15 Bionic and A18 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of A15 Bionic and A18
A15 Bionic was released 2 years, 11 months, 26 days earlier than A18.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the A18 is clearly better overall compared to the A15 Bionic. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.