A14 Bionic VS A19
We are comparing the A14 Bionic (Apple) with the A19 (Apple). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: August 6, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF A14 Bionic AND A19
Here’s how A14 Bionic and A19 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why A19 is the best choice:
-
55% higher AnTuTu V11 score (2132538 vs 1375134)
-
74% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (3621 vs 2079)
-
92% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (9168 vs 4779)
-
37% higher CPU frequency (4260 MHz vs 3100 MHz)
-
100% higher memory frequency (4266 MHz vs 2133 MHz)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF A14 Bionic AND A19
Below is the detailed specification table comparing A14 Bionic and A19.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | A14 Bionic | A19 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | A14 Bionic | A19 |
| Brand: | Apple | Apple |
| Class: | Mid-End | High-End |
| Release Date: | September 15, 2020 | September 9, 2025 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv8.5-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 6 | 6 |
| CPU Architecture: | 2x 3.1 GHz Firestorm + 4x 1.8 GHz Icestorm | 2x 4.26 GHz, 4x 2.60 GHz |
| CPU Frequency: | 3100 MHz | 4260 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Apple A14 Bionic GPU | Apple A19 GPU |
| Graphics Architecture: | Apple Bionic | Apple Bionic |
| GPU Frequency: | 1278 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 4 | 5 |
| Shading Units: | 64 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 654.3 Gigaflops | 2073.6 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 2133 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 34.1 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 2079 | 3621 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 4779 | 9168 |
| Asset Compression | 167 MB/sec | 304.8 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 167 MB/sec | 208.2 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 116.4 Mpixels/sec | 210.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 95.7 images/sec | 293 images/sec |
| HDR | 147.6 Mpixels/sec | 306.7 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 17.6 images/sec | 36.7 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 51.5 images/sec | 96.8 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 5.18 Mpixels/sec | 9.64 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 1375134 | 2132538 |
| CPU | 454216 | 592245 |
| GPU | 329634 | 782493 |
| MEM | 158491 | 191866 |
| UX | 432793 | 565934 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 1113239 | 2300150 |
| CPU | 303719 | 796193 |
| GPU | 329975 | 904328 |
| MEM | 182615 | 219323 |
| UX | 296930 | 380306 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | 7655 | — |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 7500 Mbps | Up to 10000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 5.0 | 6.0 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Apple Neural Engine | Neural Engine |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | 11 TOPS | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF A14 Bionic AND A19
The charts below visualize how A14 Bionic and A19 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the A19 dominates overall compared to the A14 Bionic. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.