A19 Pro VS Exynos 2600
We are comparing the A19 Pro (Apple) with the Exynos 2600 (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: September 13, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF A19 Pro AND Exynos 2600
Here’s how A19 Pro and Exynos 2600 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the A19 Pro
-
13% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (3895 vs 3455)
-
12% higher CPU frequency (4260 MHz vs 3800 MHz)
-
18% higher memory bandwidth (75.8 GB/s vs 64 GB/s)
Reasons to consider the Exynos 2600
-
14% higher AnTuTu V11 score (3161830 vs 2785402)
-
19% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (11621 vs 9746)
-
1.7× more CPU cores (10 vs 6)
-
50% faster download speed (15000 Mbps vs 10000 Mbps)
-
1.3× more GPU pipelines (8 vs 6)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF A19 Pro AND Exynos 2600
Below is the detailed specification table comparing A19 Pro and Exynos 2600.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | A19 Pro | Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | A19 Pro | Exynos 2600 |
| Brand: | Apple | Samsung |
| Class: | High-End | High-End |
| Release Date: | September 9, 2025 | December 19, 2025 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.3-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 6 | 10 |
| CPU Architecture: | 2x 4.26 GHz, 4x 2.51 GHz | 1x 3.8 GHz C1-Ultra, 3x 3.25 GHz C1-Pro, 6x 2.75 GHz C1-Pro |
| CPU Frequency: | 4260 MHz | 3800 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Apple A19 Pro GPU | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Apple A19 Pro GPU | RDNA 4 |
| GPU Frequency: | 1620 MHz | 980 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 6 | 8 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 2488.3 Gigaflops | 4014.1 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 4800 MHz | — |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 75.8 Gb/s | 64 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3895 | 3455 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9746 | 11621 |
| GPU (V6) | — | 27627 |
| Asset Compression | 320.6 MB/sec | 459.4 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 229.2 pages/sec | 328.1 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 221.9 Mpixels/sec | 345 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 335.4 images/sec | 259.1 images/sec |
| HDR | 327.3 Mpixels/sec | 344.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 38.9 images/sec | 41.7 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 110.7 images/sec | 97.1 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 10.2 Mpixels/sec | 12.2 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2785402 | 3161830 |
| CPU | 844594 | 1060612 |
| GPU | 950787 | 1200578 |
| MEM | 301140 | 409429 |
| UX | 688881 | 491211 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2600719 | 3115908 |
| CPU | 929218 | 991772 |
| GPU | 976500 | 1258872 |
| MEM | 285782 | 554880 |
| UX | 409219 | 310384 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 10000 Mbps | Up to 15000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 6.0 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Neural Engine | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF A19 Pro AND Exynos 2600
The charts below visualize how A19 Pro and Exynos 2600 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Exynos 2600 edges out overall compared to the A19 Pro. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU, Memory and Connectivity. They are still fairly close in Graphics.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.