A19 Pro VS Exynos 2500
We are comparing the A19 Pro (Apple) with the Exynos 2500 (Samsung). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Last Updated: March 28, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF A19 Pro AND Exynos 2500
Here’s how A19 Pro and Exynos 2500 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the A19 Pro
-
14% higher AnTuTu V11 score (2785402 vs 2437711)
-
66% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (3895 vs 2352)
-
20% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (9746 vs 8103)
-
29% higher CPU frequency (4260 MHz vs 3300 MHz)
-
13% higher memory frequency (4800 MHz vs 4266 MHz)
Reasons to consider the Exynos 2500
-
1.7× more CPU cores (10 vs 6)
-
20% faster download speed (12000 Mbps vs 10000 Mbps)
-
1.3× more GPU pipelines (8 vs 6)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF A19 Pro AND Exynos 2500
Below is the detailed specification table comparing A19 Pro and Exynos 2500.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | A19 Pro | Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | A19 Pro | Exynos 2500 |
| Brand: | Apple | Samsung |
| Class: | High-End | High-End |
| Release Date: | September 9, 2025 | June 23, 2025 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung Foundry |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 6 | 10 |
| CPU Architecture: | 2x 4.26 GHz, 4x 2.51 GHz | 1x 3.3 GHz Cortex-X925, 2x 2.74 GHz Cortex-A725, 5x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A725, 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Frequency: | 4260 MHz | 3300 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Apple A19 Pro GPU | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Apple A19 Pro GPU | RDNA 3 |
| GPU Frequency: | 1620 MHz | 999 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 6 | 8 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 2488.3 Gigaflops | 4091.9 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 4800 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 75.8 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3895 | 2352 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9746 | 8103 |
| GPU (V6) | — | 25840 |
| Asset Compression | 320.6 MB/sec | 390.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 229.2 pages/sec | 179.4 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 221.9 Mpixels/sec | 218.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 335.4 images/sec | 247.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 327.3 Mpixels/sec | 309 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 38.9 images/sec | 36.4 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 110.7 images/sec | 89.9 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 10.2 Mpixels/sec | 12.7 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2785402 | 2437711 |
| CPU | 844594 | 822434 |
| GPU | 950787 | 817393 |
| MEM | 301140 | 339157 |
| UX | 688881 | 458727 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2600719 | 2047807 |
| CPU | 929218 | 486530 |
| GPU | 976500 | 828627 |
| MEM | 285782 | 441040 |
| UX | 409219 | 291610 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 10000 Mbps | Up to 12000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 5.4 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| NPU Theoretical Performance: | — | 59 TOPS |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF A19 Pro AND Exynos 2500
The charts below visualize how A19 Pro and Exynos 2500 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of A19 Pro and Exynos 2500
Exynos 2500 was released 2 months, 17 days earlier than A19 Pro.
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the A19 Pro edges out overall compared to the Exynos 2500. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU and Graphics. The Exynos 2500 is the better fit if your top priority is Memory and Connectivity.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.