A19 Pro VS Exynos 2400e
We are comparing the A19 Pro ( Apple ) head-to-head with the Exynos 2400e ( Samsung ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each chipset, in-depth specs, and benchmarking scores.
Note: This comparison of A19 Pro vs. Exynos 2400e is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 12, 2026
KEY DIFFERENCES OF A19 Pro AND Exynos 2400e
Here’s how A19 Pro and Exynos 2400e stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which chipset excels where.
Reasons to consider the A19 Pro
-
41% higher AnTuTu V11 score (2785402 vs 1971406)
-
90% higher Single-Core Geekbench score (3895 vs 2051)
-
46% higher Multi-Core Geekbench score (9746 vs 6690)
-
37% higher CPU frequency (4260 MHz vs 3110 MHz)
-
14% higher memory frequency (4800 MHz vs 4200 MHz)
Reasons to consider the Exynos 2400e
-
1.7× more CPU cores (10 vs 6)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF A19 Pro AND Exynos 2400e
Below is the detailed specification table comparing A19 Pro and Exynos 2400e.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that SoC wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | A19 Pro | Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
|
General Information
|
||
| Name: | A19 Pro | Exynos 2400e |
| Brand: | Apple | Samsung |
| Class: | High-End | Flagship |
| Release Date: | September 9, 2025 | September 26, 2024 |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung |
| Instruction Set: | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
|
CPU
|
||
| CPU Cores: | 6 | 10 |
| CPU Architecture: | 2x 4.26 GHz, 4x 2.51 GHz | 1x 3.11 GHz Cortex-X4, 2x 2.9 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 4x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| CPU Frequency: | 4260 MHz | 3110 MHz |
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
||
| GPU Model: | Apple A19 Pro GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| Graphics Architecture: | Apple A19 Pro GPU | RDNA 3 |
| GPU Frequency: | 1620 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| GPU Pipelines: | 6 | 6 |
| Shading Units: | 128 | 128 |
| GPU FLOPS: | 2488.3 Gigaflops | 3406.8 Gigaflops |
|
Memory Subsystem
|
||
| Memory Type: | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max Memory Size: | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Frequency: | 4800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Memory Bandwidth: | 75.8 Gb/s | 68.2 Gb/s |
| Memory Bus Width: | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
|
Benchmark Scores
|
||
|
GEEKBENCH
|
||
| Single-Core (V6) | 3895 | 2051 |
| Multi-Core (V6) | 9746 | 6690 |
| GPU (V6) | — | 16611 |
| Asset Compression | 320.6 MB/sec | 270.2 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 229.2 pages/sec | 202.5 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 221.9 Mpixels/sec | 196.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Image Detection | 335.4 images/sec | 150.7 images/sec |
| HDR | 327.3 Mpixels/sec | 200.6 Mpixels/sec |
| Background Blur | 38.9 images/sec | 23.6 images/sec |
| Photo Processing | 110.7 images/sec | 59.3 images/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 10.2 Mpixels/sec | 7.7 Mpixels/sec |
|
ANTUTU SCORE
|
||
| Overall (AnTuTu V11) | 2785402 | 1971406 |
| CPU | 844594 | 675688 |
| GPU | 950787 | 653205 |
| MEM | 301140 | 234506 |
| UX | 688881 | 408007 |
| Overall (AnTuTu V10) | 2600719 | 1625873 |
| CPU | 929218 | 400082 |
| GPU | 976500 | 698721 |
| MEM | 285782 | 238234 |
| UX | 409219 | 288836 |
|
3DMARK
|
||
| Score | — | 1769 |
|
Connectivity & I/O
|
||
| Cellular Download Speed: | Up to 10000 Mbps | Up to 9640 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi Version: | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth Version: | 6.0 | 5.3 |
|
AI & Acceleration
|
||
| Neural Processor: | Neural Engine | NPU |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF A19 Pro AND Exynos 2400e
The charts below visualize how A19 Pro and Exynos 2400e stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of A19 Pro and Exynos 2400e
Exynos 2400e was released 11 months, 14 days earlier than A19 Pro.
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the A19 Pro is slightly better overall compared to the Exynos 2400e. Its strongest advantages are in Benchmark, CPU, Graphics and Connectivity. The Exynos 2400e is the better fit if your top priority is Memory.
Try to Compare Again One of These SoCs With Another SoC
Pick which SoC to keep, then search for the other SoC to compare.