Radeon RX 9070 XT VS Radeon RX 9070
We are comparing the Radeon RX 9070 XT (AMD) with the Radeon RX 9070 (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 19, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Radeon RX 9070 XT AND Radeon RX 9070
Here’s how Radeon RX 9070 XT and Radeon RX 9070 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Radeon RX 9070 XT is the best choice:
-
7% higher 4K Ultra FPS (89 vs 83)
-
9% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (151 vs 139)
-
7% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (193 vs 180)
-
18% higher Boost Clock (2970 MHz vs 2520 MHz)
-
11% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (29803 vs 26923)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Radeon RX 9070 XT AND Radeon RX 9070
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Radeon RX 9070 XT and Radeon RX 9070.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Radeon RX 9070 XT | Radeon RX 9070 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | Radeon RX 9070 XT | Radeon RX 9070 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | — | Navi 48 |
| Vendor: | AMD | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | RDNA 4.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Generation: | Navi IV (RX 9000) | Navi IV (RX 9000) |
| Release Date: | March 6, 2025 | March 6, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistors: | 53.9 billion | 53.9 billion |
| Density: | 151.19 MTr/mm² | 151.19 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 356.5 | 356.5 |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 304 W | 220 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 64 | 56 |
| Shading Units: | 4096 | 3584 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 256 | 224 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 128 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores: | 128 | 112 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 64 | 56 |
| Base Clock: | 1660 | 1330 |
| Boost Clock: | 2970 | 2520 |
| L1 Cache: | 128KB per cluster | 128 KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 4MB shared | 8 MB |
| L3 Cache: | — | 64 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 380.2 GPixel/s | 322.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 760.3 GTexel/s | 564.5 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 48.66 TFLOPs | 36.13 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2518 | 2518 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 20100 | 20100 |
| Bandwidth: | 640 | 640 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| CUDA: | No | No |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | No | No |
| DisplayPort: | 2.1a | 2.1a |
| HDMI: | — | 2.1b |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 193 | 180 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 151 | 139 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 89 | 83 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 26116 | 22669 |
| Time Spy | 29803 | 26923 |
| Solar Bay | 120093 | 105195 |
| Port Royal | 18556 | 16114 |
| Fire Strike | 66408 | 60172 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 54361 | 48175 |
| Night Raid | 196877 | 176602 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 182816 | 149949 |
| Background Blur | 427.4 img/sec | 377.5 |
| Face Detection | 251 img/sec | 221.3 |
| Horizon Detection | 6.77 Gpixels/sec | 6.4 |
| Edge Detection | 9.42 Gpixels/sec | 8.99 |
| Gaussian Blur | 9.35 Gpixels/sec | 8.52 |
| Feature Matching | 1.42 Gpixels/sec | 1.36 |
| Stereo Matching | 651.4 Gpixels/sec | 606 |
| Particle Physics | 23630 FPS | 8521.2 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 26866 | 25420 |
| G2D Mark | 1320 | 1272 |
| DirectX 11 | 294 | 279 |
| DirectX 12 | 77 | 74 |
| GPU Compute | 15958 Ops/s | 14801 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 313.30 | 274.70 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 1794.90 | 1412.60 |
| Car Chase | 1498.00 | 1332.40 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 1199.30 | 1061.20 |
| T-Rex | 5080.10 | 4127.00 |
| Tessellation | 6928.50 | 6097.50 |
| ALU 2 | 9196.70 | 7774.70 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 339.10 | 276.10 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 3116 | 2729 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 39190 | 37056 |
| Half Precision | 55727 | 54866 |
| Quantized | 33599 | 29946 |
| Image Classification | 18001 | 15375 |
| Image Segmentation | 25174 | 37834 |
| Image Super Resolution | 45714 | 43910 |
| Face Detection | 74776 | 67858 |
| Pose Estimation | 196137 | 172939 |
| Text Classification | 5163 | 4469 |
| Machine Translation | 8677 | 8499 |
| Object Detection | 19602 | 15393 |
| Depth Estimation | 74879 | 66890 |
| Style Transfer | 411302 | 365633 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 19161 | 17149 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 14200 | 12146 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 7713 | 5814 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 20135 | 17615 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 14412 | 11876 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 7754 | 5810 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Radeon RX 9070 XT AND Radeon RX 9070
The charts below visualize how Radeon RX 9070 XT and Radeon RX 9070 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Radeon RX 9070
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Radeon RX 9070 XT edges out overall compared to the Radeon RX 9070. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning and Workstation. They are still fairly close in Hardware Architecture and Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.