Radeon RX 9070 XT VS Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
We are comparing the Radeon RX 9070 XT (AMD) with the Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 8, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Radeon RX 9070 XT AND Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
Here’s how Radeon RX 9070 XT and Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 9070 XT
-
65% higher 4K Ultra FPS (89 vs 54)
-
61% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (151 vs 94)
-
51% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (193 vs 128)
-
82% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (29803 vs 16412)
-
90% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (18556 vs 9749)
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
-
5% higher Boost Clock (3130 MHz vs 2970 MHz)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Radeon RX 9070 XT AND Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Radeon RX 9070 XT and Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB).
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Radeon RX 9070 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | Radeon RX 9070 XT | Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | — | Navi 44 |
| Vendor: | AMD | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | RDNA 4.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Generation: | Navi IV (RX 9000) | Navi IV |
| Release Date: | March 6, 2025 | June 4, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistors: | 53.9 billion | 29.7 billion |
| Density: | 151.19 MTr/mm² | 149.2 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 356.5 | 199 mm² |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 304 W | 160 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 64 | 32 |
| Shading Units: | 4096 | 2048 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 256 | 128 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 128 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores: | 128 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 64 | 32 |
| Base Clock: | 1660 | 1700 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2970 | 3130 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128KB per cluster | — |
| L2 Cache: | 4MB shared | 4 MB |
| L3 Cache: | — | 32 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 380.2 GPixel/s | 200.3 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 760.3 GTexel/s | 400.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 48.66 TFLOPs | 25.64 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2518 | 2518 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 20100 | 20100 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 640 | 322.3 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| CUDA: | No | No |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | No | No |
| DisplayPort: | 2.1a | 2.1a |
| HDMI: | — | 2.1b |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 193 | 128 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 151 | 94 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 89 | 54 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 26116 | 13913 |
| Time Spy | 29803 | 16412 |
| Solar Bay | 120093 | 65209 |
| Port Royal | 18556 | 9749 |
| Fire Strike | 66408 | 38956 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 54361 | 27723 |
| Night Raid | 196877 | 149101 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 182816 | 107640 |
| Background Blur | 427.4 img/sec | 269.5 |
| Face Detection | 251 img/sec | 151 |
| Horizon Detection | 6.77 Gpixels/sec | 3.6 |
| Edge Detection | 9.42 Gpixels/sec | 4.67 |
| Gaussian Blur | 9.35 Gpixels/sec | 5.27 |
| Feature Matching | 1.42 Gpixels/sec | 1.08 |
| Stereo Matching | 651.4 Gpixels/sec | 395.3 |
| Particle Physics | 23630 FPS | 13165.7 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 26866 | 20049 |
| G2D Mark | 1320 | 1177 |
| DirectX 11 | 294 | 185 |
| DirectX 12 | 77 | 57 |
| GPU Compute | 15958 Ops/s | 11171 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 313.30 | 141.10 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 1794.90 | 950.10 |
| Car Chase | 1498.00 | 773.30 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 1199.30 | 636.10 |
| T-Rex | 5080.10 | 2727.40 |
| Tessellation | 6928.50 | 4164.10 |
| ALU 2 | 9196.70 | 5094.70 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 339.10 | 335.10 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 3116 | 1578 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 39190 | 25924 |
| Half Precision | 55727 | 40429 |
| Quantized | 33599 | 22275 |
| Image Classification | 18001 | 12380 |
| Image Segmentation | 25174 | 15402 |
| Image Super Resolution | 45714 | 32024 |
| Face Detection | 74776 | 50457 |
| Pose Estimation | 196137 | 113796 |
| Text Classification | 5163 | 4460 |
| Machine Translation | 8677 | 7481 |
| Object Detection | 19602 | 11256 |
| Depth Estimation | 74879 | 53978 |
| Style Transfer | 411302 | 235750 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 19161 | 10902 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 14200 | 7889 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 7713 | 3392 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 20135 | 11275 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 14412 | 7905 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 7754 | 3925 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Radeon RX 9070 XT AND Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
The charts below visualize how Radeon RX 9070 XT and Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Radeon RX 9070 XT and Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
Radeon RX 9070 XT was released 2 months, 29 days earlier than Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB).
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
Radeon RX 9070 XT
Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Radeon RX 9070 XT is clearly better overall compared to the Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB). Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning, Hardware Architecture and Workstation. They are still fairly close in Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.