Radeon RX 9070 VS GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
We are comparing the Radeon RX 9070 (AMD) with the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (NVIDIA). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 22, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Radeon RX 9070 AND GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Here’s how Radeon RX 9070 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 9070
-
3% higher Boost Clock (2520 MHz vs 2452 MHz)
-
20% smaller process node (4 nm vs 5 nm)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
-
5% higher 4K Ultra FPS (87 vs 83)
-
6% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (148 vs 139)
-
3% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (185 vs 180)
-
3% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (27800 vs 26923)
-
21% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (19478 vs 16114)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Radeon RX 9070 AND GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Radeon RX 9070 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Radeon RX 9070 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | Radeon RX 9070 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | Navi 48 | GB203-200-A1 |
| Vendor: | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | RDNA 4.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Generation: | Navi IV (RX 9000) | GeForce 50 |
| Release Date: | March 6, 2025 | February 20, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 53.9 billion | 45.6 billion |
| Density: | 151.19 MTr/mm² | 120.63 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 356.5 | 378 |
| Board Length: | — | 304 mm |
| Board Width: | — | 48 mm |
| Board Height: | — | 137 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 220 W | 300 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 56 | 70 |
| Shading Units: | 3584 | 8960 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 224 | 280 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 128 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores: | 112 | 280 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 56 | 70 |
| Base Clock: | 1330 | 2295 |
| Boost Clock: | 2520 | 2452 |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per cluster | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 8 MB | 48MB shared |
| L3 Cache: | 64 MB | — |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 322.6 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 564.5 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 36.13 TFLOPs | 43.94 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2518 | 1750 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 20100 | 28000 |
| Bandwidth: | 640 | 896 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | No | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | No | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort: | 2.1a | 2.1b |
| HDMI: | 2.1b | — |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 180 | 185 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 139 | 148 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 83 | 87 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 22669 | 29948 |
| Time Spy | 26923 | 27800 |
| Solar Bay | 105195 | 136509 |
| Port Royal | 16114 | 19478 |
| Fire Strike | 60172 | 67265 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 48175 | 57591 |
| Night Raid | 176602 | 190530 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 149949 | 240508 |
| Background Blur | 377.5 | 297.9 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 221.3 | 218.6 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 6.4 | 10.1 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 8.99 | 13.9 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 8.52 | 14.8 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.36 | 2.03 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 606 | 1290 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 8521.2 | 35438.3 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 25420 | 32464 |
| G2D Mark | 1272 | 1333 |
| DirectX 11 | 279 | 303 |
| DirectX 12 | 74 | 126 |
| GPU Compute | 14801 | 18318 Ops/s |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 274.70 | 343.80 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 1412.60 | 1450.00 |
| Car Chase | 1332.40 | 1281.40 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 1061.20 | 983.70 |
| T-Rex | 4127.00 | 4055.80 |
| Tessellation | 6097.50 | 10135.40 |
| ALU 2 | 7774.70 | 9247.00 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 276.10 | 251.70 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 2729 | 7571 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 37056 | 36504 |
| Half Precision | 54866 | 64459 |
| Quantized | 29946 | 27312 |
| Image Classification | 15375 | 14913 |
| Image Segmentation | 37834 | 45199 |
| Image Super Resolution | 43910 | 39360 |
| Face Detection | 67858 | 84188 |
| Pose Estimation | 172939 | 161400 |
| Text Classification | 4469 | 4010 |
| Machine Translation | 8499 | 7973 |
| Object Detection | 15393 | 18934 |
| Depth Estimation | 66890 | 67761 |
| Style Transfer | 365633 | 335879 |
| Framework | ONNX | 335879 |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 17149 | 18040 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 12146 | 13580 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 5814 | 7899 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 17615 | 16844 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 11876 | 12892 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 5810 | 7775 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Radeon RX 9070 AND GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The charts below visualize how Radeon RX 9070 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
Radeon RX 9070
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti edges out overall compared to the Radeon RX 9070. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning and Workstation. They are still fairly close in Hardware Architecture and Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.