Radeon RX 6600 VS Intel Arc A770
We are comparing the Radeon RX 6600 (AMD) with the Intel Arc A770 (Intel). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 20, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Radeon RX 6600 AND Intel Arc A770
Here’s how Radeon RX 6600 and Intel Arc A770 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6600
-
6% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (93 vs 88)
-
4% higher Boost Clock (2491 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
-
13% higher PassMark G3D Mark score (15070 vs 13327)
-
10% higher PassMark GPU Compute score (6480 vs 5867)
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770
-
30% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (13556 vs 10403)
-
24% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (7226 vs 5818)
-
96% higher Geekbench 6 OpenCL score (113935 vs 58048)
-
79% higher Blender score (1748 vs 977)
-
120% higher FP32 Compute (19.66 TFLOPS vs 8.93 TFLOPS)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Radeon RX 6600 AND Intel Arc A770
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Radeon RX 6600 and Intel Arc A770.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Radeon RX 6600 | Intel Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | Radeon RX 6600 | Intel Arc A770 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | Navi 23 | DG2-512 |
| Vendor: | AMD | Intel |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | RDNA 2.0 | Xe-HPG |
| Generation: | Navi II (RX 6000) | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
| Release Date: | October 13, 2021 | October 12, 2022 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 8 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors: | 11.06 billion | 21 billion |
| Density: | 46.7 MTr/mm² | 51.72 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 237 mm² | 406 mm² |
| Board Length: | 190 mm | — |
| Board Width: | 40 mm | — |
| Board Height: | 110 mm | — |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 132 W | 225 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 28 | 32 |
| Shading Units: | 1792 | 4096 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 112 | 256 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 64 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores: | — | 512 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 28 | 32 |
| Base Clock: | 1626 MHz | 2100 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2491 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per Array | — |
| L2 Cache: | 2 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 Cache: | 32 MB | — |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 159.4 GPixel/s | 307 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 279.0 GTexel/s | 614 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 8.928 TFLOPs | 19.66 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1750 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 14000 Mbps | 16000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 224 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | 1 | Yes |
| DLSS: | 0 | No |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 2.0 |
| HDMI: | 2.1 | 2.1 |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 93 | 88 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 65 | 66 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 36 | 36 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 10212 | 12643 |
| Time Spy | 10403 | 13556 |
| Solar Bay | 44756 | 51077 |
| Port Royal | 5818 | 7226 |
| Fire Strike | 26496 | 34234 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 19820 | 26250 |
| Night Raid | 98341 | 122688 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 58048 | 113935 |
| Background Blur | 104.1 img/sec | 175 |
| Face Detection | 79.7 img/sec | 98 |
| Horizon Detection | 2.05 Gpixels/sec | 3.63 |
| Edge Detection | 2.61 Gpixels/sec | 5.51 |
| Gaussian Blur | 2.59 Gpixels/sec | 8.51 |
| Feature Matching | 0.64 Gpixels/sec | 0.89 |
| Stereo Matching | 257.8 Gpixels/sec | 492.6 |
| Particle Physics | 7635.3 | 24819.2 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 15070 | 13327 |
| G2D Mark | 896 | 758 |
| DirectX 11 | 153 | 77 |
| DirectX 12 | 51 | 74 |
| GPU Compute | 6480 | 5867 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 96.40 | 220.60 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 567.80 | 792.80 |
| Car Chase | — | 539.00 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 427.90 | 517.90 |
| T-Rex | 1906.10 | 2854.60 |
| Tessellation | — | 4205.30 |
| ALU 2 | 2284.30 | 3955.40 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 600.00 | 287.50 |
| API | Metal | OpenGL |
| OS | OS X | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 977 | 1748 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 12643 | 13344 |
| Half Precision | 15089 | 14119 |
| Quantized | 9547 | 10082 |
| Image Classification | 5441 | 5750 |
| Image Segmentation | 6810 | 16175 |
| Image Super Resolution | 15043 | 12997 |
| Face Detection | 19066 | 21409 |
| Pose Estimation | 58821 | 67820 |
| Text Classification | 1943 | 849 |
| Machine Translation | 2928 | 2627 |
| Object Detection | 4309 | 7465 |
| Depth Estimation | 23470 | 24186 |
| Style Transfer | 132475 | 183238 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 5893 | 11127 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 3869 | 6512 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 1836 | 2993 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 6509 | 9965 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 4172 | 6247 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2090 | 2959 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Radeon RX 6600 AND Intel Arc A770
The charts below visualize how Radeon RX 6600 and Intel Arc A770 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Radeon RX 6600 and Intel Arc A770
Radeon RX 6600 was released 11 months, 29 days earlier than Intel Arc A770.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
Radeon RX 6600
Intel Arc A770
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Intel Arc A770 has a narrow overall lead compared to the Radeon RX 6600. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning, Hardware Architecture and Workstation. The Radeon RX 6600 is the better fit if your top priority is Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.