Radeon RX 580 VS GeForce RTX 5050
We are comparing the Radeon RX 580 ( AMD ) head-to-head with the GeForce RTX 5050 ( NVIDIA ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of Radeon RX 580 vs. GeForce RTX 5050 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 20, 2026
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Radeon RX 580 AND GeForce RTX 5050
Here’s how Radeon RX 580 and GeForce RTX 5050 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 580
-
100% higher Memory Bus Width (256 Bit vs 128 Bit)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5050
-
185% higher 4K Ultra FPS (37 vs 13)
-
154% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (66 vs 26)
-
133% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (91 vs 39)
-
92% higher Boost Clock (2572 MHz vs 1340 MHz)
-
135% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (10217 vs 4354)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Radeon RX 580 AND GeForce RTX 5050
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Radeon RX 580 and GeForce RTX 5050.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Radeon RX 580 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | Radeon RX 580 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | Polaris 20 | GB207-300 |
| Vendor: | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture: | GCN 4.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Generation: | Polaris (RX 500) | GeForce 50 |
| Release Date: | April 18, 2017 | July 1, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |
| PCIe Version: | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 16 | x8 |
| Process Size: | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 5.7 billion | 16.9 billion |
| Density: | 24.6 MTr/mm² | 113.42 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 232 mm² | 149 |
| Board Length: | 241 mm | — |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 185 W | 130 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 36 | 20 |
| Shading Units: | 2304 | 2560 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 144 | 80 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 32 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores: | — | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | — | 20 |
| Base Clock: | 1257 MHz | 2317 |
| Boost Clock: | 1340 MHz | 2572 |
| L1 Cache: | 16 KB (per CU) | 128 KB (per SM) |
| L2 Cache: | 2 MB | 24 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 42.88 GPixel/s | 82.30 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 193.0 GTexel/s | 205.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 6.175 TFLOPs | t) 13.17 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2000 MHz | 1750 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 8000 Mbps | 20000 |
| Bandwidth: | 256 GB/s | 320 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.0 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | — | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | 0 | Yes |
| DLSS: | 0 | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 2.1b |
| HDMI: | 2.0b | — |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 39 | 91 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 26 | 66 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 13 | 37 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 4179 | 10059 |
| Time Spy | 4354 | 10217 |
| Solar Bay | — | 46901 |
| Port Royal | 527 | 6150 |
| Fire Strike | 14979 | 28740 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 8915 | 18958 |
| Night Raid | 56861 | 111889 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 40514 | 92181 |
| Background Blur | 59.5 img/sec | 129.6 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 33.8 img/sec | 94.6 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 1.56 Gpixels/sec | 3.45 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 3.1 Gpixels/sec | 4.41 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 2.92 Gpixels/sec | 4.43 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.33 Gpixels/sec | 1.16 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 161.8 Gpixels/sec | 434.1 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 5395.1 | 13990.8 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 8792 | 17408 |
| G2D Mark | 769 | 1088 |
| DirectX 11 | 60 | 152 |
| DirectX 12 | 43 | 69 |
| GPU Compute | 3431 | 8550 Ops/s |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 392 | 2876 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 7905 | 16926 |
| Half Precision | 8166 | 34904 |
| Quantized | 5642 | 13248 |
| Image Classification | 3143 | 7103 |
| Image Segmentation | 3955 | 22390 |
| Image Super Resolution | 7872 | 17642 |
| Face Detection | 11922 | 40054 |
| Pose Estimation | 41162 | 66253 |
| Text Classification | 1199 | 3436 |
| Machine Translation | 1773 | 5705 |
| Object Detection | 3620 | 8910 |
| Depth Estimation | 13995 | 31732 |
| Style Transfer | 84083 | 107993 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 3674 | — |
| 1440p Vulkan | 2454 | — |
| 2160p Vulkan | 1331 | — |
| 1080p OpenGL | 3778 | 7796 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 2568 | — |
| 2160p OpenGL | 1354 | 2011 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Radeon RX 580 AND GeForce RTX 5050
The charts below visualize how Radeon RX 580 and GeForce RTX 5050 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Radeon RX 580 and GeForce RTX 5050
Radeon RX 580 was released 8 years, 2 months, 13 days earlier than GeForce RTX 5050.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
Radeon RX 580
GeForce RTX 5050
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5050 dominates overall compared to the Radeon RX 580. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.