Intel Arc A770 VS Radeon RX 6700 XT
We are comparing the Intel Arc A770 (Intel) with the Radeon RX 6700 XT (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 14, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Arc A770 AND Radeon RX 6700 XT
Here’s how Intel Arc A770 and Radeon RX 6700 XT stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A770
-
6% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (13556 vs 12813)
-
17% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (7226 vs 6190)
-
3% higher Geekbench 6 OpenCL score (113935 vs 110742)
-
15% higher Blender score (1748 vs 1518)
-
49% higher FP32 Compute (19.66 TFLOPS vs 13.21 TFLOPS)
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6700 XT
-
19% higher 4K Ultra FPS (43 vs 36)
-
15% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (76 vs 66)
-
19% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (105 vs 88)
-
8% higher Boost Clock (2581 MHz vs 2400 MHz)
-
48% higher PassMark G3D Mark score (19742 vs 13327)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Arc A770 AND Radeon RX 6700 XT
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Arc A770 and Radeon RX 6700 XT.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Arc A770 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | Intel Arc A770 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | DG2-512 | Navi 22 |
| Vendor: | Intel | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Xe-HPG | RDNA 2.0 |
| Generation: | Alchemist (Arc 7) | Navi II (RX 6000) |
| Release Date: | October 12, 2022 | March 3, 2021 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | 16 |
| Process Size: | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors: | 21 billion | 17 billion |
| Density: | 51.72 MTr/mm² | 50.75 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 406 mm² | 335 mm² |
| Board Length: | — | 267 mm |
| Board Width: | — | 40 mm |
| Board Height: | — | 110 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 225 W | 230 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 32 | 40 |
| Shading Units: | 4096 | 2560 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 256 | 160 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 128 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores: | 512 | — |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 32 | 40 |
| Base Clock: | 2100 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2400 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | — | 128 KB per Array |
| L2 Cache: | 16 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache: | — | 96 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 307 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 614 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 19.66 TFLOPs | 13.21 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 192-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 16000 Mbps | 16000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 512 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | 1 |
| DLSS: | No | 0 |
| DisplayPort: | 2.0 | 1.4a |
| HDMI: | 2.1 | 2.1 |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 88 | 105 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 66 | 76 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 36 | 43 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 12643 | 11432 |
| Time Spy | 13556 | 12813 |
| Solar Bay | 51077 | 50228 |
| Port Royal | 7226 | 6190 |
| Fire Strike | 34234 | 35839 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 26250 | 22915 |
| Night Raid | 122688 | 130531 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 113935 | 110742 |
| Background Blur | 175 | 245.8 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 98 | 153.3 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.63 | 3.99 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 5.51 | 5.82 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 8.51 | 4.37 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.89 | 1.01 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 492.6 | 474.4 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 24819.2 | 13872.6 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 13327 | 19742 |
| G2D Mark | 758 | 953 |
| DirectX 11 | 77 | 173 |
| DirectX 12 | 74 | 77 |
| GPU Compute | 5867 | 9278 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 220.60 | 173.60 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 792.80 | 943.90 |
| Car Chase | 539.00 | 840.00 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 517.90 | 743.30 |
| T-Rex | 2854.60 | 2906.30 |
| Tessellation | 4205.30 | 2414.40 |
| ALU 2 | 3955.40 | 3886.30 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 287.50 | 290.80 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 1748 | 1518 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 13344 | 21026 |
| Half Precision | 14119 | 21983 |
| Quantized | 10082 | 16106 |
| Image Classification | 5750 | 9076 |
| Image Segmentation | 16175 | 10972 |
| Image Super Resolution | 12997 | 24228 |
| Face Detection | 21409 | 32365 |
| Pose Estimation | 67820 | 100249 |
| Text Classification | 849 | 2204 |
| Machine Translation | 2627 | 4803 |
| Object Detection | 7465 | 9882 |
| Depth Estimation | 24186 | 37762 |
| Style Transfer | 183238 | 210688 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 11127 | 9153 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 6512 | 6300 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 2993 | 3237 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 9965 | 10146 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 6247 | 6900 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2959 | 3596 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Arc A770 AND Radeon RX 6700 XT
The charts below visualize how Intel Arc A770 and Radeon RX 6700 XT stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
Intel Arc A770
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Radeon RX 6700 XT has a narrow overall lead compared to the Intel Arc A770. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning and Energy Efficiency. The Intel Arc A770 is the better fit if your top priority is Hardware Architecture and Workstation.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.