Intel Arc A770 VS GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
We are comparing the Intel Arc A770 (Intel) with the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (NVIDIA). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 22, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF Intel Arc A770 AND GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Here’s how Intel Arc A770 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why Intel Arc A770 is the best choice:
-
371% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (66 vs 14)
-
340% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (88 vs 20)
-
72% higher Boost Clock (2400 MHz vs 1392 MHz)
-
476% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (13556 vs 2352)
-
110% higher PassMark G3D Mark score (13327 vs 6360)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF Intel Arc A770 AND GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Below is the detailed specification table comparing Intel Arc A770 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | Intel Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | Intel Arc A770 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | DG2-512 | GP107 |
| Vendor: | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | Samsung |
| Architecture: | Xe-HPG | Pascal |
| Generation: | Alchemist (Arc 7) | GeForce 10 |
| Release Date: | October 12, 2022 | October 25, 2016 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | 16 |
| Process Size: | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors: | 21 billion | 3.3 billion |
| Density: | 51.72 MTr/mm² | 25.0 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 406 mm² | 132 mm² |
| Board Length: | — | 145 mm |
| Board Height: | — | 111 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 225 W | 75 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 32 | 6 |
| Shading Units: | 4096 | 768 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 256 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 128 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores: | 512 | — |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 32 | — |
| Base Clock: | 2100 MHz | 1291 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2400 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | — | 48 KB (per SM) |
| L2 Cache: | 16 MB | 1024 KB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 307 GPixel/s | 44.54 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 614 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 19.66 TFLOPs | 2.138 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Size: | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 16000 Mbps | 7000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 512 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | — | 6.1 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | 0 |
| DLSS: | No | 0 |
| DisplayPort: | 2.0 | 1.4a |
| HDMI: | 2.1 | 2.0 |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 88 | 20 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 66 | 14 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 36 | — |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 12643 | 2312 |
| Time Spy | 13556 | 2352 |
| Solar Bay | 51077 | — |
| Port Royal | 7226 | — |
| Fire Strike | 34234 | 7702 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 26250 | 4903 |
| Night Raid | 122688 | 33477 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 113935 | 21180 |
| Background Blur | 175 | 56.6 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 98 | 27.4 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.63 | 0.82 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 5.51 | 1.2 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 8.51 | 1.27 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.89 | 0.18 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 492.6 | 66.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 24819.2 | 1916.5 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 13327 | 6360 |
| G2D Mark | 758 | 655 |
| DirectX 11 | 77 | 44 |
| DirectX 12 | 74 | 26 |
| GPU Compute | 5867 | 2664 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 220.60 | — |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 792.80 | — |
| Car Chase | 539.00 | — |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 517.90 | — |
| T-Rex | 2854.60 | — |
| Tessellation | 4205.30 | — |
| ALU 2 | 3955.40 | — |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 287.50 | — |
| API | OpenGL | — |
| OS | Windows | — |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 1748 | 219 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 13344 | 4117 |
| Half Precision | 14119 | 3560 |
| Quantized | 10082 | 3084 |
| Image Classification | 5750 | 1518 |
| Image Segmentation | 16175 | 2085 |
| Image Super Resolution | 12997 | 4847 |
| Face Detection | 21409 | 3275 |
| Pose Estimation | 67820 | 16118 |
| Text Classification | 849 | 1440 |
| Machine Translation | 2627 | 1875 |
| Object Detection | 7465 | 1743 |
| Depth Estimation | 24186 | 6258 |
| Style Transfer | 183238 | 26368 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 11127 | — |
| 1440p Vulkan | 6512 | — |
| 2160p Vulkan | 2993 | — |
| 1080p OpenGL | 9965 | — |
| 1440p OpenGL | 6247 | — |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2959 | — |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF Intel Arc A770 AND GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The charts below visualize how Intel Arc A770 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of Intel Arc A770 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti was released 5 years, 11 months, 17 days earlier than Intel Arc A770.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
Intel Arc A770
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Intel Arc A770 dominates overall compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.