GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) VS GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) (NVIDIA) with the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) (NVIDIA). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 16, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) AND GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
Here’s how GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Why GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) is the best choice:
-
5% higher Geekbench 6 OpenCL score (148626 vs 141028)
-
100% more VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) AND GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB).
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | GB207-300 | GB206 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 50 | GeForce 50 |
| Release Date: | April 16, 2025 | April 16, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |
| PCIe Version: | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x8 | x8 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 21.9 billion | 21.9 billion |
| Density: | 120.99 MTr/mm² | 121.0 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 181 | 181 mm² |
| Board Length: | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Board Width: | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Board Height: | 111 mm | 111 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 130 W | 180 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 36 | 36 |
| Shading Units: | 4608 | 4608 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 144 | 144 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 48 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores: | 144 | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 36 | 36 |
| Base Clock: | 2407 | 2407 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2572 | 2572 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128KB per cluster | 128 KB per SM |
| L2 Cache: | 32MB shared | 32 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 123.5 GPixel/s | 123.5 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 370.4 GTexel/s | 370.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 23.70 TFLOPs | 23.70 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1750 | 1750 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 28000 | 28000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 448 | 448.0 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 4 | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort: | 2.1b | 2.1b |
| HDMI: | — | 2.1b |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 129 | 130 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 98 | 99 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 57 | 58 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 16124 | 16214 |
| Time Spy | 15707 | 16029 |
| Solar Bay | 75293 | 75557 |
| Port Royal | 9985 | 10165 |
| Fire Strike | 41539 | 42431 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 30412 | 30099 |
| Night Raid | 141896 | 150693 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 141028 | 148626 |
| Background Blur | 197.7 img/sec | 243.1 |
| Face Detection | 131.5 img/sec | 149.5 |
| Horizon Detection | 5.28 Gpixels/sec | 5.35 |
| Edge Detection | 6.79 Gpixels/sec | 6.88 |
| Gaussian Blur | 7.74 Gpixels/sec | 7.76 |
| Feature Matching | 1.53 Gpixels/sec | 1.57 |
| Stereo Matching | 726.7 Gpixels/sec | 740.2 |
| Particle Physics | 21833.6 FPS | 22183.7 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 22700 | 22700 |
| G2D Mark | 1216 | 1216 |
| DirectX 11 | 219 | 219 |
| DirectX 12 | 89 | 89 |
| GPU Compute | 11373 Ops/s | 11373 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | — | 171.70 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | — | 903.40 |
| Car Chase | — | 792.70 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | — | 641.00 |
| T-Rex | — | 2827.50 |
| Tessellation | — | 5095.60 |
| ALU 2 | — | 4413.60 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | — | 265.70 |
| API | — | OpenGL |
| OS | — | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 4313 | 4338 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 23734 | 24763 |
| Half Precision | 43218 | 47486 |
| Quantized | 18191 | 18826 |
| Image Classification | 9511 | 10281 |
| Image Segmentation | 29012 | 29909 |
| Image Super Resolution | 25621 | 26549 |
| Face Detection | 52204 | 59010 |
| Pose Estimation | 122234 | 117200 |
| Text Classification | 3209 | 3993 |
| Machine Translation | 6074 | 6647 |
| Object Detection | 6074 | 12742 |
| Depth Estimation | 45666 | 44856 |
| Style Transfer | 182591 | 175892 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 11900 | 11900 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 8514 | 8514 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 3626 | 3626 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 11245 | 11275 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 8415 | 8415 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 3922 | 3922 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) AND GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) were released on the same day.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB)
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) has a narrow overall lead compared to the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB). Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning and Workstation. They are still fairly close in Hardware Architecture and Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.