GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) VS Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) (NVIDIA) with the Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: November 2, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) AND Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
Here’s how GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
-
7% higher 4K Ultra FPS (58 vs 54)
-
5% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (99 vs 94)
-
4% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (10165 vs 9749)
-
13% higher PassMark G3D Mark score (22700 vs 20049)
-
38% higher Geekbench 6 OpenCL score (148626 vs 107640)
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
-
22% higher Boost Clock (3130 MHz vs 2572 MHz)
-
8% higher FP32 Compute (25.64 TFLOPS vs 23.7 TFLOPS)
-
20% smaller process node (4 nm vs 5 nm)
-
Higher bandwidth bus link (PCIe 5.0 x16)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) AND Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB).
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) | Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) | Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | GB206 | Navi 44 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 50 | Navi IV |
| Release Date: | April 16, 2025 | June 4, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x8 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistors: | 21.9 billion | 29.7 billion |
| Density: | 121.0 MTr/mm² | 149.2 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 181 mm² | 199 mm² |
| Board Length: | 241 mm | — |
| Board Width: | 40 mm | — |
| Board Height: | 111 mm | — |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 180 W | 160 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 36 | 32 |
| Shading Units: | 4608 | 2048 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 144 | 128 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 48 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores: | 144 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 36 | 32 |
| Base Clock: | 2407 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2572 MHz | 3130 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per SM | — |
| L2 Cache: | 32 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 Cache: | — | 32 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 123.5 GPixel/s | 200.3 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 370.4 GTexel/s | 400.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 23.70 TFLOPs | 25.64 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1750 MHz | 2518 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 28000 Mbps | 20100 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 448.0 GB/s | 322.3 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| CUDA: | 12.0 | No |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 4 | No |
| DisplayPort: | 2.1b | 2.1a |
| HDMI: | 2.1b | 2.1b |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 130 | 128 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 99 | 94 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 58 | 54 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 16214 | 13913 |
| Time Spy | 16029 | 16412 |
| Solar Bay | 75557 | 65209 |
| Port Royal | 10165 | 9749 |
| Fire Strike | 42431 | 38956 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 30099 | 27723 |
| Night Raid | 150693 | 149101 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 148626 | 107640 |
| Background Blur | 243.1 | 269.5 |
| Face Detection | 149.5 | 151 |
| Horizon Detection | 5.35 | 3.6 |
| Edge Detection | 6.88 | 4.67 |
| Gaussian Blur | 7.76 | 5.27 |
| Feature Matching | 1.57 | 1.08 |
| Stereo Matching | 740.2 | 395.3 |
| Particle Physics | 22183.7 | 13165.7 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 22700 | 20049 |
| G2D Mark | 1216 | 1177 |
| DirectX 11 | 219 | 185 |
| DirectX 12 | 89 | 57 |
| GPU Compute | 11373 | 11171 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 171.70 | 141.10 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 903.40 | 950.10 |
| Car Chase | 792.70 | 773.30 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 641.00 | 636.10 |
| T-Rex | 2827.50 | 2727.40 |
| Tessellation | 5095.60 | 4164.10 |
| ALU 2 | 4413.60 | 5094.70 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 265.70 | 335.10 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 4338 | 1578 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 24763 | 25924 |
| Half Precision | 47486 | 40429 |
| Quantized | 18826 | 22275 |
| Image Classification | 10281 | 12380 |
| Image Segmentation | 29909 | 15402 |
| Image Super Resolution | 26549 | 32024 |
| Face Detection | 59010 | 50457 |
| Pose Estimation | 117200 | 113796 |
| Text Classification | 3993 | 4460 |
| Machine Translation | 6647 | 7481 |
| Object Detection | 12742 | 11256 |
| Depth Estimation | 44856 | 53978 |
| Style Transfer | 175892 | 235750 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 11900 | 10902 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 8514 | 7889 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 3626 | 3392 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 11275 | 11275 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 8415 | 7905 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 3922 | 3925 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) AND Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) has a narrow overall lead compared to the Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB). Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance and Workstation. The Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) is the better fit if your top priority is Hardware Architecture.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Frequently Asked Questions about GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) vs Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB)
Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) scores 2.4% higher than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) in 3DMark Time Spy (16,412 vs 16,029).
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) scores 4.3% higher than Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) in 3DMark Port Royal (10,165 vs 9,749).
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) scores 38.1% higher than Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) in Geekbench 6 OpenCL (148,626 vs 107,640).
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) have the same listed graphics memory capacity (16 GB vs 16 GB).
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) has 39% higher memory bandwidth than Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) (448.0 GB/s vs 322.3 GB/s).
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) lists GDDR7 for memory type, while Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) lists GDDR6 for memory type.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) lists 180 W for graphics power, while Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) lists 160 W for graphics power.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) scores 174.9% higher than Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) in Blender (4,338 vs 1,578).
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) lists PCIe 5.0 x8 for bus interface, while Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) lists PCIe 5.0 x16 for bus interface.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) was released on April 16, 2025. Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) was released on June 4, 2025. Radeon RX 9060 XT (16GB) was released 49 days after GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB).
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.