GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) VS Radeon RX 7700 XT
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) ( NVIDIA ) head-to-head with the Radeon RX 7700 XT ( AMD ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) vs. Radeon RX 7700 XT is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 18, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) AND Radeon RX 7700 XT
Here’s how GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 7700 XT stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
-
12% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (10165 vs 9109)
-
12% higher Geekbench 6 OpenCL score (148626 vs 132843)
-
106% higher Blender score (4338 vs 2101)
-
4% more memory bandwidth (448 GB/s vs 432 GB/s)
-
33% more VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 7700 XT
-
7% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (17097 vs 16029)
-
14% higher PassMark GPU Compute score (12960 vs 11373)
-
48% higher FP32 Compute (35.17 TFLOPS vs 23.7 TFLOPS)
-
50% higher Memory Bus Width (192 Bit vs 128 Bit)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) AND Radeon RX 7700 XT
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 7700 XT.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | GB206 | Navi 32 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 50 | Navi III (RX 7000) |
| Release Date: | April 16, 2025 | August 25, 2023 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x8 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 21.9 billion | 28.1 billion |
| Density: | 121.0 MTr/mm² | 81.2 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 181 mm² | 346 mm² |
| Board Length: | 241 mm | 267 mm |
| Board Width: | 40 mm | 50 mm |
| Board Height: | 111 mm | 135 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 180 W | 245 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 36 | 54 |
| Shading Units: | 4608 | 3456 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 144 | 216 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 48 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores: | 144 | 108 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 36 | 54 |
| Base Clock: | 2407 MHz | 1435 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2572 MHz | 2544 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per SM | 128 KB per Array |
| L2 Cache: | 32 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache: | — | 48 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 123.5 GPixel/s | 244.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 370.4 GTexel/s | 549.5 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 23.70 TFLOPs | 35.17 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 192-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1750 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 28000 Mbps | 18000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 448.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| CUDA: | 12.0 | — |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 4 | — |
| FSR: | — | FSR |
| DisplayPort: | 2.1b | 2.1 |
| HDMI: | 2.1b | 2.1a |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 130 | 132 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 99 | 98 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 58 | 57 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 16214 | 14951 |
| Time Spy | 16029 | 17097 |
| Solar Bay | 75557 | 64396 |
| Port Royal | 10165 | 9109 |
| Fire Strike | 42431 | 42698 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 30099 | 29981 |
| Night Raid | 150693 | 146678 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 148626 | 132843 |
| Background Blur | 243.1 | 285.8 |
| Face Detection | 149.5 | 181.6 |
| Horizon Detection | 5.35 | 4.9 |
| Edge Detection | 6.88 | 6.66 |
| Gaussian Blur | 7.76 | 5.68 |
| Feature Matching | 1.57 | 1.18 |
| Stereo Matching | 740.2 | 493 |
| Particle Physics | 22183.7 | 19410.5 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 22700 | 22633 |
| G2D Mark | 1216 | 1162 |
| DirectX 11 | 219 | 232 |
| DirectX 12 | 89 | 81 |
| GPU Compute | 11373 | 12960 |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 171.70 | 174.90 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 903.40 | 1178.60 |
| Car Chase | 792.70 | 1007.50 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 641.00 | 806.10 |
| T-Rex | 2827.50 | 3466.60 |
| Tessellation | 5095.60 | 4717.00 |
| ALU 2 | 4413.60 | 5953.90 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 265.70 | 280.30 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 4338 | 2101 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 24763 | 25719 |
| Half Precision | 47486 | 30075 |
| Quantized | 18826 | 19789 |
| Image Classification | 10281 | 11284 |
| Image Segmentation | 29909 | 14150 |
| Image Super Resolution | 26549 | 27972 |
| Face Detection | 59010 | 35311 |
| Pose Estimation | 117200 | 142235 |
| Text Classification | 3993 | 3836 |
| Machine Translation | 6647 | 4471 |
| Object Detection | 12742 | 12084 |
| Depth Estimation | 44856 | 49197 |
| Style Transfer | 175892 | 301429 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 11900 | 11349 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 8514 | 8332 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 3626 | 4160 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 11275 | 11363 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 8415 | 8623 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 3922 | 4547 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) AND Radeon RX 7700 XT
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 7700 XT stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) and Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT was released 1 year, 7 months, 22 days earlier than GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB).
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB)
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (16GB) is slightly better overall compared to the Radeon RX 7700 XT. Its strongest advantages are in AI & Machine Learning, Hardware Architecture, Workstation and Energy Efficiency. They are still fairly close in Gaming Performance.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.