GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop VS Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB)
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (NVIDIA) with the Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB) (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: September 1, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop AND Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB)
Here’s how GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop and Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB) stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
-
19% more memory bandwidth (384 GB/s vs 322.3 GB/s)
-
Faster memory type (GDDR7)
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB)
-
58% higher Boost Clock (3130 MHz vs 1976 MHz)
-
17% higher PassMark G3D Mark score (19820 vs 16882)
-
72% higher PassMark GPU Compute score (10769 vs 6265)
-
165% higher FP32 Compute (25.64 TFLOPS vs 9.68 TFLOPS)
-
20% smaller process node (4 nm vs 5 nm)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop AND Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB)
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop and Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB).
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB) |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB) |
| GPU Type: | Laptop GPU | Discrete |
| Codename: | GB206 | Navi 44 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 50 Mobile | Navi IV |
| Release Date: | April 14, 2025 | June 4, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | 16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistors: | 21.9 billion | 29.7 billion |
| Density: | 120.99 MTr/mm² | 149.2 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 181 mm² | 199 mm² |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 45-115 W | 150 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 26 | 32 |
| Shading Units: | 3328 | 2048 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 104 | 128 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 48 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores: | 104 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 26 | 32 |
| Base Clock: | 952-1455 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 1455-2497 MHz | 3130 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB per cluster | — |
| L2 Cache: | 32 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 Cache: | — | 32 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 69.84 GPixel/s | 200.3 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 151.3 GTexel/s | 400.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 9.684 TFLOPs | 25.64 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1750 MHz | 2518 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 24000 Mbps | 20100 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 384 GB/s | 322.3 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| CUDA: | 12.0 | No |
| Ray Tracing: | 1 | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 4 | No |
| FSR: | — | FSR 3 |
| DisplayPort: | 2.1b | 2.1a |
| HDMI: | — | 2.1b |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 105 | — |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 77 | — |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 44 | — |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 11870 | — |
| Time Spy | 12014 | — |
| Solar Bay | 52601 | — |
| Port Royal | 7421 | — |
| Fire Strike | 31698 | — |
| Wild Life Extreme | 21586 | — |
| Night Raid | 115861 | — |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 108121 | — |
| Background Blur | 171 img/sec | — |
| Face Detection | 112.1 img/sec | — |
| Horizon Detection | 3.82 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Edge Detection | 5.06 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Gaussian Blur | 5.45 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Feature Matching | 1.24 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Stereo Matching | 515.3 Gpixels/sec | — |
| Particle Physics | 16147.9 | — |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 16882 | 19820 |
| G2D Mark | 853 | 1132 |
| DirectX 11 | 163 | 187 |
| DirectX 12 | 79 | 56 |
| GPU Compute | 6265 | 10769 |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 3539 | — |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 18679 | — |
| Half Precision | 35323 | — |
| Quantized | 14707 | — |
| Image Classification | 7525 | — |
| Image Segmentation | 23623 | — |
| Image Super Resolution | 19973 | — |
| Face Detection | 41164 | — |
| Pose Estimation | 77589 | — |
| Text Classification | 2880 | — |
| Machine Translation | 5811 | — |
| Object Detection | 9966 | — |
| Depth Estimation | 37206 | — |
| Style Transfer | 136961 | — |
| Framework | ONNX | — |
| Backend | DirectML | — |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 9722 | 10902 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 4221 | 7889 |
| 2160p Vulkan | — | 3392 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 8574 | 11275 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 5951 | 7905 |
| 2160p OpenGL | — | 3925 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop AND Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB)
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop and Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB) stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop and Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB)
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop was released 1 month, 21 days earlier than Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB).
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB)
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the Radeon RX 9060 XT (8GB) has a narrow overall lead compared to the GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop. Its strongest advantages are in Hardware Architecture and Workstation. The GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop is the better fit if your top priority is Gaming Performance and AI & Machine Learning.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.