GeForce RTX 5050 VS Radeon RX 5700
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 5050 (NVIDIA) with the Radeon RX 5700 (AMD). Scroll down to the pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Last Updated: November 2, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 5050 AND Radeon RX 5700
Here’s how GeForce RTX 5050 and Radeon RX 5700 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5050
-
19% higher 4K Ultra FPS (37 vs 31)
-
14% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (66 vs 58)
-
11% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (91 vs 82)
-
49% higher Boost Clock (2572 MHz vs 1725 MHz)
-
31% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (10217 vs 7821)
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 5700
-
40% more memory bandwidth (448 GB/s vs 320 GB/s)
-
100% higher Memory Bus Width (256 Bit vs 128 Bit)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5050 AND Radeon RX 5700
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 5050 and Radeon RX 5700.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 5050 | Radeon RX 5700 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | GB207-300 | Navi 10 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 50 | Navi (RX 5000) |
| Release Date: | July 1, 2025 | July 7, 2019 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x8 | 16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors: | 16.9 billion | 10.3 billion |
| Density: | 113.42 MTr/mm² | 41.0 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 149 | 251 mm² |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 130 W | 180 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 20 | 36 |
| Shading Units: | 2560 | 2304 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 80 | 144 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 32 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores: | 80 | — |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 20 | — |
| Base Clock: | 2317 | 1465 MHz |
| Boost Clock: | 2572 | 1725 MHz |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB (per SM) | — |
| L2 Cache: | 24 MB | 4 MB |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 82.30 GPixel/s | 110.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 205.8 GTexel/s | 248.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | t) 13.17 TFLOPs | 7.95 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1750 | 1750 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 20000 | 14000 Mbps |
| Bandwidth: | 320 | 448 GB/s |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| CUDA: | 12.0 | — |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | 0 |
| DLSS: | DLSS 4 | 0 |
| DisplayPort: | 2.1b | 1.4a |
| HDMI: | — | 2.0b |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 91 | 82 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 66 | 58 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 37 | 31 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 10059 | 7375 |
| Time Spy | 10217 | 7821 |
| Solar Bay | 46901 | — |
| Port Royal | 6150 | — |
| Fire Strike | 28740 | 19423 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 18958 | 18334 |
| Night Raid | 111889 | 49322 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 92181 | 63122 |
| Background Blur | 129.6 img/sec | 109.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 94.6 img/sec | 66.8 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.45 Gpixels/sec | 2.88 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 4.41 Gpixels/sec | 3.99 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 4.43 Gpixels/sec | 3.18 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.16 Gpixels/sec | 625.5 Mpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 434.1 Gpixels/sec | 230.4 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 13990.8 FPS | 7350.3 |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 17408 | 14254 |
| G2D Mark | 1088 | 878 |
| DirectX 11 | 152 | 101 |
| DirectX 12 | 69 | 54 |
| GPU Compute | 8550 Ops/s | 6443 |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 2876 | 878 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 16926 | 13812 |
| Half Precision | 34904 | 15866 |
| Quantized | 13248 | 10479 |
| Image Classification | 7103 | 5926 |
| Image Segmentation | 22390 | 7470 |
| Image Super Resolution | 17642 | 23588 |
| Face Detection | 40054 | 17781 |
| Pose Estimation | 66253 | 79942 |
| Text Classification | 3436 | 1576 |
| Machine Translation | 5705 | 4102 |
| Object Detection | 8910 | 6069 |
| Depth Estimation | 31732 | 33923 |
| Style Transfer | 107993 | 127941 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | — | 6693 |
| 1440p Vulkan | — | 4204 |
| 2160p Vulkan | — | 2023 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 7796 | 7024 |
| 1440p OpenGL | — | 4284 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2011 | 2197 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5050 AND Radeon RX 5700
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 5050 and Radeon RX 5700 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 5050
Radeon RX 5700
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Scores are generated by Comparigon's scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5050 dominates overall compared to the Radeon RX 5700. It comes out ahead across every comparable key area.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.
Frequently Asked Questions about GeForce RTX 5050 vs Radeon RX 5700
GeForce RTX 5050 scores 30.6% higher than Radeon RX 5700 in 3DMark Time Spy (10,217 vs 7,821).
GeForce RTX 5050 scores 46% higher than Radeon RX 5700 in Geekbench 6 OpenCL (92,181 vs 63,122).
GeForce RTX 5050 and Radeon RX 5700 have the same listed graphics memory capacity (8 GB vs 8 GB).
Radeon RX 5700 has 40% higher memory bandwidth than GeForce RTX 5050 (448 GB/s vs 320 GB/s).
Both list GDDR6 for memory type.
GeForce RTX 5050 lists 130 W for graphics power, while Radeon RX 5700 lists 180 W for graphics power.
GeForce RTX 5050 scores 227.6% higher than Radeon RX 5700 in Blender (2,876 vs 878).
GeForce RTX 5050 lists PCIe 5.0 x8 for bus interface, while Radeon RX 5700 lists PCIe 4.0 x16 for bus interface.
GeForce RTX 5050 was released on July 1, 2025. Radeon RX 5700 was released on July 7, 2019. GeForce RTX 5050 was released 2186 days after Radeon RX 5700.
Disclaimer: Specs, pricing, and benchmarks are sourced from official manufacturer data and verified test results. While we strive for precision, product details and pricing may change. Comparigon may earn an affiliate commission on qualifying purchases.