GeForce RTX 5050 VS GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB)
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 5050 ( NVIDIA ) head-to-head with the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) ( NVIDIA ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of GeForce RTX 5050 vs. GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 20, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 5050 AND GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB)
Here’s how GeForce RTX 5050 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Why GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) is the best choice:
-
54% higher 4K Ultra FPS (57 vs 37)
-
48% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (98 vs 66)
-
42% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (129 vs 91)
-
54% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (15707 vs 10217)
-
62% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (9985 vs 6150)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5050 AND GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB)
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 5050 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB).
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 5050 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | GB207-300 | GB207-300 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 50 | GeForce 50 |
| Release Date: | July 1, 2025 | April 16, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |
| PCIe Version: | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x8 | x8 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 16.9 billion | 21.9 billion |
| Density: | 113.42 MTr/mm² | 120.99 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 149 | 181 |
| Board Length: | — | 241 mm |
| Board Width: | — | 40 mm |
| Board Height: | — | 111 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 130 W | 130 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 20 | 36 |
| Shading Units: | 2560 | 4608 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 80 | 144 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 32 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores: | 80 | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 20 | 36 |
| Base Clock: | 2317 | 2407 |
| Boost Clock: | 2572 | 2572 |
| L1 Cache: | 128 KB (per SM) | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 24 MB | 32MB shared |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 82.30 GPixel/s | 123.5 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 205.8 GTexel/s | 370.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | t) 13.17 TFLOPs | 23.70 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Size: | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1750 | 1750 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 20000 | 28000 |
| Bandwidth: | 320 | 448 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 4 | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort: | 2.1b | 2.1b |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 91 | 129 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 66 | 98 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 37 | 57 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 10059 | 16124 |
| Time Spy | 10217 | 15707 |
| Solar Bay | 46901 | 75293 |
| Port Royal | 6150 | 9985 |
| Fire Strike | 28740 | 41539 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 18958 | 30412 |
| Night Raid | 111889 | 141896 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 92181 | 141028 |
| Background Blur | 129.6 img/sec | 197.7 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 94.6 img/sec | 131.5 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 3.45 Gpixels/sec | 5.28 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 4.41 Gpixels/sec | 6.79 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 4.43 Gpixels/sec | 7.74 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.16 Gpixels/sec | 1.53 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 434.1 Gpixels/sec | 726.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 13990.8 FPS | 21833.6 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 17408 | 22700 |
| G2D Mark | 1088 | 1216 |
| DirectX 11 | 152 | 219 |
| DirectX 12 | 69 | 89 |
| GPU Compute | 8550 Ops/s | 11373 Ops/s |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 2876 | 4313 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 16926 | 23734 |
| Half Precision | 34904 | 43218 |
| Quantized | 13248 | 18191 |
| Image Classification | 7103 | 9511 |
| Image Segmentation | 22390 | 29012 |
| Image Super Resolution | 17642 | 25621 |
| Face Detection | 40054 | 52204 |
| Pose Estimation | 66253 | 122234 |
| Text Classification | 3436 | 3209 |
| Machine Translation | 5705 | 6074 |
| Object Detection | 8910 | 6074 |
| Depth Estimation | 31732 | 45666 |
| Style Transfer | 107993 | 182591 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | — | 11900 |
| 1440p Vulkan | — | 8514 |
| 2160p Vulkan | — | 3626 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 7796 | 11245 |
| 1440p OpenGL | — | 8415 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 2011 | 3922 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 5050 AND GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB)
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 5050 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 5050 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB)
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) was released 2 months, 15 days earlier than GeForce RTX 5050.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 5050
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB)
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) is slightly better overall compared to the GeForce RTX 5050. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning, Hardware Architecture and Workstation. They are still fairly close in Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.