GeForce RTX 4090 VS GeForce RTX 5080
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4090 ( NVIDIA ) head-to-head with the GeForce RTX 5080 ( NVIDIA ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 vs. GeForce RTX 5080 is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: June 17, 2026
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4090 AND GeForce RTX 5080
Here’s how GeForce RTX 4090 and GeForce RTX 5080 stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4090
-
8% higher 4K Ultra FPS (105 vs 97)
-
8% higher 1440p Ultra FPS (176 vs 163)
-
7% higher 1080p Ultra FPS (218 vs 204)
-
10% higher 3DMark Time Spy score (36315 vs 32982)
-
13% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (26128 vs 23151)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5080
-
4% higher Boost Clock (2617 MHz vs 2520 MHz)
-
Faster memory type (GDDR7)
-
Higher bandwidth bus link (PCIe 5.0 x16)
-
Newer PCIe Version (5.0)
-
Newer DisplayPort Version (2.1b)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4090 AND GeForce RTX 5080
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4090 and GeForce RTX 5080.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 4090 | GeForce RTX 5080 |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | AD102 | GB203-400 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 40 | GeForce 50 |
| Release Date: | September 20, 2022 | January 30, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 76.3 billion | 45.6 billion |
| Density: | 125.29 MTr/mm² | 120.63 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 609 | 378 |
| Board Length: | 304 mm | 304 mm |
| Board Width: | 61 mm | 40 mm |
| Board Height: | 137 mm | 137 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 450 W | 360 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 128 | 84 |
| Shading Units: | 16384 | 10752 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 512 | 336 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 176 | 112 |
| Tensor Cores: | 512 | 336 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 128 | 84 |
| Base Clock: | 2235 | 2295 |
| Boost Clock: | 2520 | 2617 |
| L1 Cache: | 128KB per cluster | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 72MB shared | 48MB shared |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 443.5 GPixel/s | 293.1 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 1,290.2 GTexel/s | 879.3 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 82.58 TFLOPs | 56.28 |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Size: | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 384-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 2625 | 1875 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 21000 | 30000 |
| Bandwidth: | 1010 | 960 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 8.9 | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 3 | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 2.1b |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 218 | 204 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 176 | 163 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 105 | 97 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 42154 | 36152 |
| Time Spy | 36315 | 32982 |
| Solar Bay | 187290 | 159749 |
| Port Royal | 26128 | 23151 |
| Fire Strike | 72272 | 75121 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 85225 | 69289 |
| Night Raid | 195744 | 201706 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 316301 | 297747 |
| Background Blur | 318.9 img/sec | 319.6 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 222.8 img/sec | 225 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 14.2 Gpixels/sec | 13.6 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 21 Gpixels/sec | 19.5 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 23.9 Gpixels/sec | 20.4 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 2.38 Gpixels/sec | 2.33 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 1950 Gpixels/sec | 1750 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 48090.4 FPS | 43676.6 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 38098 | 35748 |
| G2D Mark | 1303 | 1411 |
| DirectX 11 | 324 | 327 |
| DirectX 12 | 151 | 144 |
| GPU Compute | 26273 Ops/s | 19636 Ops/s |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 615.90 | 410.90 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 1617.60 | 1955.90 |
| Car Chase | 1228.60 | — |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 1234.60 | — |
| T-Rex | 6286.00 | — |
| Tessellation | 12119.10 | — |
| ALU 2 | 15073.40 | — |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 303.70 | — |
| API | OpenGL | Vulkan |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 11795 | 9148 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 42962 | 38994 |
| Half Precision | 59636 | 66609 |
| Quantized | 31670 | 29206 |
| Image Classification | 15600 | 15441 |
| Image Segmentation | 36657 | 47173 |
| Image Super Resolution | 48114 | 43223 |
| Face Detection | 78111 | 92863 |
| Pose Estimation | 289639 | 202202 |
| Text Classification | 4074 | 3701 |
| Machine Translation | 6349 | 7905 |
| Object Detection | 21186 | 20955 |
| Depth Estimation | 75599 | 69068 |
| Style Transfer | 601428 | 349205 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 27475 | 24089 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 20403 | 17793 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 11883 | 9566 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 24851 | 21448 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 19078 | 16787 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 11425 | 9566 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4090 AND GeForce RTX 5080
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4090 and GeForce RTX 5080 stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 4090 and GeForce RTX 5080
GeForce RTX 4090 was released 2 years, 4 months, 10 days earlier than GeForce RTX 5080.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 5080
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5080 is slightly better overall compared to the GeForce RTX 4090. Its strongest advantages are in Gaming Performance, AI & Machine Learning, Hardware Architecture and Workstation. The GeForce RTX 4090 is the better fit if your top priority is Energy Efficiency.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.