GeForce RTX 4080 VS GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
We are comparing the GeForce RTX 4080 ( NVIDIA ) head-to-head with the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti ( NVIDIA ) . You’ll get the key pros and cons of each graphics card, in-depth specs, and gaming benchmarks.
Note: This comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 vs. GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is based on Comparigon's analysis and is for informational purposes only.
Last Updated: August 1, 2026
Overall Comparison
KEY DIFFERENCES OF GeForce RTX 4080 AND GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Here’s how GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti stack up against each other in their most impactful areas. Use these bullets to see at a glance which graphics card excels where.
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4080
-
6% higher PassMark G3D Mark score (34445 vs 32464)
-
16% higher Blender score (8765 vs 7571)
-
12% higher PassMark GPU Compute score (20450 vs 18318)
-
11% higher FP32 Compute (48.74 TFLOPS vs 43.94 TFLOPS)
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
-
8% higher 3DMark Port Royal score (19478 vs 17979)
-
10% higher Geekbench 6 OpenCL score (240508 vs 217712)
-
25% more memory bandwidth (896 GB/s vs 716.8 GB/s)
-
Faster memory type (GDDR7)
-
Higher bandwidth bus link (PCIe 5.0 x16)
SPECIFICATION TABLE COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4080 AND GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Below is the detailed specification table comparing GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti.
Note: Highlighted specs mean that GPU wins that spec row.
If neither side is highlighted, it is a tie or there is not enough data for both specs.
| Specification | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
|
General Info
|
||
| GPU Name: | GeForce RTX 4080 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |
| GPU Type: | Discrete | Discrete |
| Codename: | AD103 | GB203-200-A1 |
| Vendor: | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Foundry: | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture: | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Generation: | GeForce 40 | GeForce 50 |
| Release Date: | September 20, 2022 | February 20, 2025 |
|
Board Design
|
||
| Bus Interface: | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| PCIe Version: | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes: | x16 | x16 |
| Process Size: | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors: | 45 billion | 45.6 billion |
| Density: | 118.73 MTr/mm² | 120.63 MTr/mm² |
| Die Size: | 379 | 378 |
| Board Length: | 304 mm | 304 mm |
| Board Width: | 61 mm | 48 mm |
| Board Height: | 137 mm | 137 mm |
| Total Graphics Power (TGP): | 320 W | 300 W |
|
Graphics Processor
|
||
| Compute Units: | 76 | 70 |
| Shading Units: | 9728 | 8960 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs): | 304 | 280 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs): | 112 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores: | 304 | 280 |
| Ray Tracing Cores: | 76 | 70 |
| Base Clock: | 2205 | 2295 |
| Boost Clock: | 2505 | 2452 |
| L1 Cache: | 128KB per cluster | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache: | 64MB shared | 48MB shared |
|
Raw Performance
|
||
| Pixel Fill Rate: | 280.6 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate: | 761.5 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance: | 48.74 TFLOPs | 43.94 TFLOPs |
|
Memory
|
||
| Memory Type: | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Size: | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Bus Width: | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory Clock: | 1400 | 1750 |
| Effective Memory Speed: | 22400 | 28000 |
| Bandwidth: | 716.8 | 896 |
|
APIs
|
||
| DirectX: | 12 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan: | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL: | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL: | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA: | 8.9 | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing: | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS: | DLSS 3 | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort: | 1.4a | 2.1b |
| HDMI: | 2.1a | — |
|
Gaming FPS
|
||
| 1080p Ultra (FPS): | 186 | 185 |
| 1440p Ultra (FPS): | 147 | 148 |
| 4K Ultra (FPS): | 87 | 87 |
|
Benchmarks
|
||
|
3D Mark
|
||
| Steel Nomad Lite | 30169 | 29948 |
| Time Spy | 28164 | 27800 |
| Solar Bay | 136859 | 136509 |
| Port Royal | 17979 | 19478 |
| Fire Strike | 64634 | 67265 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 59108 | 57591 |
| Night Raid | 184754 | 190530 |
|
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
|
||
| Compute Score | 217712 | 240508 |
| Background Blur | 250.4 img/sec | 297.9 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 190 img/sec | 218.6 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 9.56 Gpixels/sec | 10.1 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 12.8 Gpixels/sec | 13.9 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 15.3 Gpixels/sec | 14.8 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.97 Gpixels/sec | 2.03 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 1130 Gpixels/sec | 1290 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 28795.5 FPS | 35438.3 FPS |
|
Passmark Graphics
|
||
| G3D Mark | 34445 | 32464 |
| G2D Mark | 1249 | 1333 |
| DirectX 9 | 373 | — |
| DirectX 10 | 202 | — |
| DirectX 11 | 313 | 303 |
| DirectX 12 | 132 | 126 |
| GPU Compute | 20450 | 18318 Ops/s |
|
GFXBench 5
|
||
| Aztec Ruins High (4K) | 320.90 | 343.80 |
| Aztec Ruins Normal | 1476.20 | 1450.00 |
| Car Chase | 1250.00 | 1281.40 |
| Manhattan 3.1.1 (1440p) | 1062.90 | 983.70 |
| T-Rex | 5492.10 | 4055.80 |
| Tessellation | 9274.80 | 10135.40 |
| ALU 2 | 9330.70 | 9247.00 |
| Driver Overhead 2 | 291.30 | 251.70 |
| API | OpenGL | OpenGL |
| OS | Windows | Windows |
|
Blender (Rendering)
|
||
| Blender Score | 8765 | 7571 |
|
GeekBench 6 ML
|
||
| Single Precision | 36799 | 36504 |
| Half Precision | 53331 | 64459 |
| Quantized | 28104 | 27312 |
| Image Classification | 13466 | 14913 |
| Image Segmentation | 34767 | 45199 |
| Image Super Resolution | 42687 | 39360 |
| Face Detection | 70927 | 84188 |
| Pose Estimation | 239350 | 161400 |
| Text Classification | 3606 | 4010 |
| Machine Translation | 6519 | 7973 |
| Object Detection | 18153 | 18934 |
| Depth Estimation | 65667 | 67761 |
| Style Transfer | 414848 | 335879 |
| Framework | ONNX | 335879 |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
|
FurMark
|
||
| 1080p Vulkan | 15032 | 18040 |
| 1440p Vulkan | 8109 | 13580 |
| 2160p Vulkan | 7752 | 7899 |
| 1080p OpenGL | 20826 | 16844 |
| 1440p OpenGL | 21847 | 12892 |
| 2160p OpenGL | 15200 | 7775 |
Tip: ▲ indicates a higher-is-better spec advantage, while ▼ indicates a lower-is-better advantage.
PERFORMANCE CHART COMPARISON OF GeForce RTX 4080 AND GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The charts below visualize how GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti stack up in key performance metrics.
Radar Chart Comparison
Bullet Chart Comparison
Release Timeline of GeForce RTX 4080 and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4080 was released 2 years, 5 months earlier than GeForce RTX 5070 Ti.
Value For Money Calculator
Prices use available launch or current data. Enter your own prices to see which GPU gives better value.
GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Calculating...
Domain Score Summary
Note: Scores (0 to 100) are generated by Comparigon’s scoring algorithm and are intended as a high-level guide. They may not map 1-to-1 with the individual spec-by-spec comparisons shown in the table.
Our Verdict
In conclusion, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti edges out overall compared to the GeForce RTX 4080. Its strongest advantages are in AI & Machine Learning, Hardware Architecture and Energy Efficiency. They are still fairly close in Gaming Performance and Workstation.
Try to Compare Again One of These GPUs With Another GPU
Pick which GPU to keep, then search for the other GPU to compare.